In part one I outlined the need for new missions strategies to bridge the gulf between the churches in North America and the new landscape of the unchurched culture.  Part one also briefly introduced how some are trying to do just that — as well as those on the wall who oppose the translation of Christianity into a new culture.

Dan Kimball is one such translator – he describes the translation process:

“In our church setting, we began bringing back ancient religious symbols and some rituals used throughout church history. We began using some forms of liturgy and responsive readings. Instead of ‘hiding’ the fact that we were gathered to worship, we began praying more, having times of quiet, and teaching more deeply.”

 

As they became more aware of their culture – like any good missionary – Kimball and his team

“…started to add other expressions of teaching – using art and visuals, for example – as well as creating more participatory ways for people to express worship. We still preach, sometimes even 35 or 40 minutes using large sections of Scripture or going through books of the Bible. But we’ve provided more ways for people to worship, to reflect the different ways that individuals express worship and learn. We’ve added some interactive prayer stations and ways for people who may not like to sing to express praise and prayer in art.” There stated goal is to be biblical in doctrine and focus on Jesus… according to Kimball: “In our setting, there is an empty cross front and center in our worship space. The focal point is the risen Jesus, not the worship leader or preacher. When I speak, it is from off to the side or down among the congregation. The music leader and band are off to the side as well. The cross is the main thing people see and focus on during worship.”

 

Who could oppose this?  Someone for who form is more important than function. It’s easy to oppose such translation of Christianity, if your goal is to preserve how things are done and you ignore what things are believed.

In his opposition to this method, Ken Silva writes,

“…those of us who truly love Christ and His Church should educate worshippers concerning this Roman bondage of religious idolatry and these heretical practices of contemplative mysticism which originated in pagan religions and then flowered through the antibiblical monastic traditions of the apostate Church of Rome.”

 

Notice Silva gives no biblical reasons why this is “antibiblical.” He offers no reasons why these practices are “mystical,” “heretical,” or “idolatry.” What he does offer is a litany of emotionally charged terms – and the origin of the practice and its association with Rome, both logical straw men.

It’s time to deconstruct the straw men of Ken Silva. So far I showed the need for new methods of reaching a new culture, an example of these new methods, and a couple straw men thrown together by those more interested in defending the walls of their traditions than they are in rejoicing over the translation of the Gospel into yet another generation. Supposedly, the methods of Dan Kimball and his team are to be rejected on grounds of ancient historical origin and guilt by association.

Regarding the first charge, that the use of ancient symbols and some rituals is to be rejected because they “originated in pagan religions.” Silva’s case is completely lacking. Absent from Silva’s reasoning is 1) What symbols and rituals are pagan?, 2) What pagans used them and when?, 3) What connection is there between those used then and those used now?, and 4) What difference does origin make, what makes them pagan?

This silly argument raises its head several times every year in neo-fundamentalist circles; whether it’s the pagan origins of Christmas trees, the word “Easter,” or even certain styles of crosses – the argument is always the same… and usually as shallow. Because someone at some time used some thing to worship some other god (which is no god really) Christians for all time are prohibited from redeeming said things for God’s glory. The neo-fundamentalists are giving paganism (and Satan by default) much more realm and power than it/he deserves. To assign some eternal ontological meaning to symbols and rituals is to give an authority to demons, Satan, and paganism that they just do not possess. No shape is ontologically pagan – shapes and symbols have exactly the meaning to which a culture gives them. Some symbols, such as the pentagram are pretty much fixed in western culture, but this is due to our assigning them such meaning – it is not ontological. Even if a connection had been made by Silva, the fact that believers 1,500 years ago shed their paganism and redeemed some of their symbols and rituals and dedicated them to the worship of the true God negates the very premise of his objection. Let’s be sure to give Satan his due respect, as it were, this warning we heed from he Scriptures – but let’s not give him more than his due!

Silva also fails to make his case regarding the second objection, that certain symbols and ritual should be rejected because they are antibiblical monastic traditions of the apostate Church of Rome. Again Silva, as is his method, employs emotional terms with no substantive argument. That some rituals and symbols were used by Rome is no more relevant than that some were once used by pagans. And here Silva must pick and choose because neo-fundamentalists use element in their worship that were, and are still, employed by Rome. That is, of course, unless the watchers do not sing hymns of worship, recite Scripture publicly, observe various holidays, etc.

So while they see themselves as watchers on the wall, the wall they defend is not between truth and error, it is an artificially constructed cultural wall – a wall between the Good News of Jesus Christ and a new generation that desperately needs to hear.

  • Share/Bookmark
This entry was posted on Monday, March 26th, 2007 at 8:29 am and is filed under Commentary, Emergent Church, Ken Silva, Original Articles. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
+/- Collapse/Expand All

22 Comments(+Add)

1   Nathan    http://www.nathanrice.org/
March 26th, 2007 at 9:32 am

I gotta say, you guys are on a freakin roll!!!
When I first subscribed to the feed, there was little activity, but lately, there have been nothing but thoughtful, biblically sound, logically coherent arguments against the distasteful behavior of the watchdogs.

I really like your methods as well. You avoid childish namecalling, you stick to the facts, and my personal favorite, none of your posts are 5 liners full of vitriolic garbage, circa CRN.com. You take their spin, successfully and completely address it with coherent arguments, and shoot it back.

My favorite line:
“Because someone at some time used some thing to worship some other god (which is no god really) Christians for all time are prohibited from redeeming said things for God’s glory.”

Nail head, meet hammer.

Great work guys!

Nathan

2   amy    
March 26th, 2007 at 4:50 pm

Neil,
I appreciate the way you think through and present things. I wish I had more time now to enter into this discussion.

But for now, here is a question that I believe has many implications for this discussion: Do you believe that there are pagan practices through which Satan can work today? That is, do you believe that there are practices that he in a sense “owns,” practices that a Christian can come under demonic influence from participating in, even if that participation is completely unintentional?

I do believe that this is possible, if God allows it. That is, Satan cannot do anything to a believer without God’s allowing it. I have a specific example of this happening – I’ll have to think about how much of the details I can share here.

3   Neil    
March 26th, 2007 at 6:36 pm

Amy,

Yes, depending on what you mean by “own” and “under demonic influence.” I believe that there are practices that are pagan that if indulged in can have spiritual (though not salvific) consequences.

Neil

4   Neil    
March 26th, 2007 at 7:13 pm

Amy,

Since you brought up labyrinths in the other post, I’ll comment on them in this context – not that they apply at all to Kimball though.

Before being booted from the Rapture Ready BB (I was too harsh on one of the other posters who is a racists) I had several lengthy discussion on labyrinths. I was the antagonist to a poster who claimed the very shape was demonic and since they were used by pagans 1,000 years ago anyone using one today opened themselves up to demonic influence.

My response was “Hogwash!” Sure people can use them in a mystical/improper sense, if they really think they must go through certain motions to conjure up a closeness to God. And some liberal churches employ them in some really “new-age” looking ways.

That said, if a church with sound theology sets up a series of “stations” and suggests their people meditate on certain biblical concepts at each one and the path happens to be circular – that is not demonic regardless of the shape.

I know a church (which is far from emerging btw) that will set up a few stations in their worship center on Maundy Thursday. In past years they’ve had a journaling station at the cross for people to write their thoughts on Christ’s sacrifice, they’ve had various religious works of art and a station for them to study the art and react to it… stuff like that. All they need to do is form them in a circle and you have a labyrinth.

I’ll admit it is possible for someone to take these to an extreme and think that God somehow “meets” them there because they do this or that – but the danger of that is no greater than someone thinking God favors them more if they add another zero to their check, or if they attend four weeks in a row.

My point is, and was – the shape is not ontologically evil. That would be closer to an animist worldview, not a biblical worldview.

This is a common theme throughout the watcher community, but Ken’s attack on Kimball with no examples, no biblical references, no connections serves as a very good example.

Neil

5   amy    
March 26th, 2007 at 10:18 pm

Neil,
I agree that it sounds ridiculous to think that a shape is evil. I think that it is easy to go overboard on looking for the demonic. I don’t have answers to what’s “black” or “white” about all the matters that fall generally under the most broad definition of contemplative, including labyrinths.

I realize that by some of my comments you may think that I go overboard. Oh well . . . Here are some miscellaneous thoughts:

I think that people are more vulnerable to subtly thinking that something has power than they realize. It would be interesting, for example, to see inside people’s head when they open fortune cookies. How many people are doing it “for fun” and think it has no relationship to their future, and how many people have the tiniest feeling of “hope it comes true,” especially if it’s something good (which the predictions usually are, I think.)

From what I’ve read, at least non-Christians do think that a power “meets” them there at the center of the labyrinth. I’ve known a lot of Christians who would easily be led to think this. Is the danger ” no greater than someone thinking God favors them more if they add another zero to their check, or if they attend four weeks in a row.” I think it could be. Because I think that there could be a power that meets them there.

I want to share this story with you. I’m going to change the surface details, but generally the essence of what happened is something that happened to me. It’s made me think twice about being very cautious about coming under power that doesn’t come from God. What happened to Ben in my story is very much like what happened to me.

Imagine a man, Ben, who has had chronic neck pain that has been especially bad for a year. He is an American living out in the African desert and there’s nowhere to go for treatment. An American Christian, who is highly respected, who is a teacher at an evangelical seminary, visits his family. We’ll call this teacher Sam.

Sam hears about Ben’s neck pain, and says, ‘My brother had a lot of pain and I did some treatments on him that really helped. Can I try to help you?” Ben agrees. He sits in a chair; Sam stands behind Ben and very gently touches Ben’s neck.Ben waits. A little while later he feels another gentle touch. He thinks, “oh, maybe Sam’s going to very gently work on each and every knot.” Over a period of about 10 minutes, Sam barely touches Ben at all. Ben kind of wonders what’s going on, but one of his Christian friends is sitting in front of him, watching the whole thing, calmly, so he assumes all is well.

Suddenly Ben’s pain is gone. Completely. There isn’t even the slightest bit of tension.

The treatment stops. Ben is told to get up. He gets up. He has a strong desire to ask Sam, “What do you want me to do next? Please, tell me. I want to do whatever you say.” Ben must look kind of hazy or something because Sam tells him, “You need to shake it off.”

The pain stays away from Ben for awhile, but eventually comes back. But Ben is full of wonder. How did the pain leave? And why his feeling of “I want to do whatever Sam says? And why the need to be told to “shake it off” and the knowledge that there was indeed something to shake off?

Years later Ben find out that Sam had been doing all kinds of hand motions behind him, that he had been “realigning his energy.”

Neil, can you put yourself in this situation? Imagine that you are Ben, that you had no intention of doing anything that would get you in some kind of semi-hypnotic state, that you didn’t purposefully practice anything questionable? Yet, obviously something had power over you.

I hesitate to share this story, because it makes me feel extremely vulnerable and open to ridicule. And yet, this is one of the reasons that I believe that there is power out there that doesn’t come from God, power that can even affect Christians. There is no way that I or anyone else can analyze every little thing that comes along to “help one grow closer to God” and prove which ones have demonic potential and which ones don’t. I just really want people to be careful. There is so much that is wonderful about feeding on God’s Word and praying to Him, and so many things that can lead us away from that; things that sound good, and may even “work” but things that put one in contact with a power other than God.

6   Neil S.    
March 27th, 2007 at 8:37 am

Amy,

I would hope and expect that you’d receive no ridicule for your story. Granted, ridicule happens, but it’s usually aimed at the rude and hostile, not the the sincere and questioning.

As for the story: I agree, anything that’s called “realigning his energy” sounds suspicious. Whether it’s purely demonic is hard to tell, but it’s certainly not something I want to be involved in, nor recommend.

The details were thin, understandably, so I don’t know Ben’s relationship to the Lord. If he was a Christian at the time, then he was indwelt by the Holy Spirit – so while demonic rituals are dangerous, it’s not like he can be possessed, loose his salvation, or give Satan some kind of legal access to his soul/body. To comment further would require more details, and is probably unnecessary – bottom line, I agree that sounds mystical in all the wrong ways.

That said, I see little or no connection between that and the symbols and rituals referred to in my original article or subsequent posts. Some non-Christians may think a power meets them in the center of a labyrinth – they’d be wrong. Some Christians may think a prayer of salvation has some better effect if prayer at an altar – they’d be wrong too.

There are all sorts of things 20th Century American Evangelical do/did that Christians can misapply due to ignorance – precious few are gonna open them to demonic realms – labyrinths included.

Thanks for the exchange,

Neil

Neil

7   amy    
March 27th, 2007 at 10:24 am

Neil,
The way the story relates to symbols/rituals is simply this: Satan does seem to be able to use things that have pagan origins. There are a number of healing techniques that use pagan rituals that are used by both Christians and non-Christians. Some of them “work,” at least for awhile. Some Christians feel that they can simply “Christianize” pagan practices of healing. I find myself constantly asking, “Are the principles behind these practices scriptural?”

I don’t know if you’ve ever investigated theophostic healing. To summarize, Christians are led in prayers by other Christians that take them back to the original cause of their anger, bitterness, etc. They are taught that they can have a picture of Jesus back there with them in that situation. I have been told by counselors who practice this that a person undergoing this kind of counseling can have a picture of a “false Jesus.” This can be a picture of Jesus that seems like him, then distorts into something immoral or demonic.

I ask myself, regarding theophostic healing, is it biblical to think that one must discover the root of one’s anger to deal with it? Perhaps it can be helpful – but scripture tells us to put off sin, such as anger, through the power of the Holy Spirit. I also look at the whole idea of “getting pictures of Jesus” as extremely questionable, especially when the whole idea of receiving pictures as a person guides you is rooted in a pagan practice. I also realize the danger of having someone guide you in any kind of imagery – their questions can intentionally or untintentionally create a “vision.”

God is perfectly capable of healing someone, physically or emotionally, without resorting to pagan practices.

We are also perfectly capable of becoming intimate with God, worshipping Him, without using pagan practices. You say that “Some non-Christians may think a power meets them in the center of a labyrinth – they’d be wrong.” But how do you know that? Satan can and does meet people, and I would say he is especially free to do this if a person is invoking him, intentionally or not. The warnings in scripture against magic, divination, etc are there because there is a power behind them.

I have many friends that work overseas, from all kinds of church backgrounds, people who are mostly at the very least college graduates – I have yet to talk with someone who believes that the “magic” that pagans or even Christians practice is simply “superstition” and has no power. Most wise people won’t focus on the things they’ve witnessed or experienced because they know that that can be a way of bringing “glory” to Satan. The story that I shared with you is only one of many that I could share. I choose not to talk about this kind of thing often. But when a discussion comes up and I think that people are erring on the side of “Satan couldn’t possibly do that” when I think he very well could, I see the need to speak up.

As for my experience, “Sam” in real life is much more than I presented him. If I told you his education, job title, it goes way beyond Phd teacher at a seminary. I have no idea how he learned how to do what he was doing. I knew practically nothing about the practice at that time. Since then I have become aware that there are many people including Christians who practice this type of healing.

One of the reasons that it was such an important learning experience for me is that I had absolutely no knowledge that I was participating in anything that was invoking power from an outside source. Yet God allowed it to affect me. Sam told me that people often have to “shake off” what they feel after they are healed.

There are some horrible websites out there that see demons everywhere; I think that their focus is all wrong. But we need to be wise in not erring in the opposite direction.

8   Neil S.    
March 27th, 2007 at 11:02 am

Amy,

I am not familiar with theophostic healing, but from what you said it does sound rather suspicious. And “magic” in any form is unbiblical. And you are correct there is power behind divination etc. – But, there is no power in a symbol or ritual ontologically.

Certainly Satan can use things that have pagan origins. He can also use things that have biblical origins as well – in Genesis 3 we see Satan quoting God to Eve – though his quote were selective and contextually inaccurate.

The problem with the neo-fundamentalists is they assign too much power to Satan. I’ve had people tell me Celtic crosses bring glory to Satan – if that’s not superstition and animism nothing is. Other have said labyrinth by their very shape are demonic – since when did Satan get title to a circle?

If a person walks an isle at a Billy Graham crusade thinking they need to do that to meet God – they are in error. If something thinks they need to walk in a circle to meet God – it’s the same error.

In the case of Kimball it’s obvious his church is just employing neutral techniques – just like the neo-funds do… except they like their techniques and not those of others.

i still believe that we are talking apples and oranges – the example you offer look unbiblical and possibly demonic – the examples I offer are neutral and meaning is supplied by use.

Neil

Neil

9   amy    
March 27th, 2007 at 1:35 pm

Neil,
When I first read something on Labyrinths, about a year ago, it was on a site that was promoting labyrinths . It was presented as an ancient ritual whereby one could connect with the divine. If I remember correctly, it was being promoted for people of all faiths. I didn’t understand it as some “neutral” ritual.

If I went to that labyrinth, do I assume that though some may be using it as a means to promote communication with a divine being who is not God, I can then use it to reach God? Why should I go to any labyrinth at all? It seems to me that there is a direct parallel in this and trying to Christianize pagan methods of healing.

It would take a lot of convincing for me to believe that this should be considered a “neutral” technique.

I agree, Satan can use many things to get people away from God. But that doesn’t change the fact that there are things that are better left alone. I would be just as uncomfortable utilizing a labyrinth as I would a Tibetan singing bowl. I don’t see much difference in the two. Perhaps you do.

Things that are classified as “magic” and “divination” in the OT had specific rituals behind them. God never said, “Go ahead and practice that ritual, because it has no power.” He commanded people to stay away from all of it.

10   amy    
March 27th, 2007 at 1:39 pm

Neil,
By the way, a pastor I know who practices long-distance healing by using her circled thumbs to feel people’s energy, then “administers” medicine to them long distance, would say that what she is doing is biblical and not demonic at all. She feels that the technique is neutral, and that it’s fine for a Christian to use it. She even considers herself specially gifted in it.

11   Neil S.    
March 27th, 2007 at 2:05 pm

Amy,

I have seen many a new age site promoting the use of labyrinths in non-christian ways as well.

I have also witnessed tribal religionists engage in group singing as a way of pleasing their deity – shall we abandon that as well?

Point both group sining and labyrinth are neutral in and of themselves.

To condemn a labyrinth as demonic is to say that a circular pattern with various stopping points is ontologically evil. Sorry I can’t go that far.

 As for the long-distance healing  – I agree that is unbiblical and nopt neutral – but it is also irrelevant – pointing out someone who abuses the term “neutral” does not impugn it is every case – it only proves that it can be misused.

Neil

12   Neil    
March 27th, 2007 at 2:20 pm

This whole discussion started with the accusation that Vintage Faith Church employed rituals that were pagan. After following several links several layers deep (on Ken Silva’s missive) – I could find no reference to any actual rituals or symbols used by Vintage… let alone how or why they were pagan.

The labyrinth was just an example I introduced. Silva seems to pick on contemplative prayer as well. The only “ritual” I found referenced on Vintage Church’s website was an evening of fasting – certainly that’s OK — right?

Neil

13   amy    
March 27th, 2007 at 3:47 pm

Neil,

Okay, let’s say that a labyrinth is not “ontologically evil” in itself.

Neither are rings from the top of coke cans. What if, in my village, a “witch” uses one of these rings in a ritual to heal the sick? Do I then take that piece of metal to church and hold it in my hands while praying for people’s healing? It has no power in itself, but it has been used “magically” for evil. Do I use any metal rings, ever, for healing? Would doing so be abusing the term “neutral?”

How is using a labyrinth different from this? Isn’t the whole concept of centering deeply imbedded in pagan thinking, and isn’t the labyrinth related to that? Isn’t it thought to have magic power? Why purposefully copy it?

It may seem like I’m just trying to win an argument – I’m really trying to understand your thinking. It’s also possible that you know more about the background of labyrinths than I do.

Sure, singing can be used in pagan rituals, but that’s not the primary history of how singing is used. Singing is also encouraged in scripture. Labyrinth walking isn’t.

I just don’t understand why you don’t think there cold be any parallels between the things I’ve suggested and labyrinths.

14   Joe Martino    http://joemartino.name
March 27th, 2007 at 4:02 pm

Amy,
Maybe when it comes to centering prayer, you have it backwards. Maybe the pagans are copying us.

15   Chris L    http://www.fishingtheabyss.com/
March 27th, 2007 at 4:16 pm

Amy,

You said:

Sure, singing can be used in pagan rituals, but that’s not the primary history of how singing is used.

Actually, singing and chanting were primary means of worship in Egypt prior to and during the time in which Israel was enslaved there, and it was a primary means of worship of baal, ashteroth and pagan gods.

Your Coke example also seems much more specifically contrived than would be parallel to the use of labyrinths (not all or even most of which was pagan in origin). Maybe a better question in your example would be whether you should ever drink Coke out of a can in the presence of those weaker brothers.

This also seems to have some parallels with the situation described by Paul with the eating of meat sacrificed to idols. While there is nothing wrong with doing so, would exercising this freedom cause another brother to stumble (i.e. to be led into sin)? This would be a good question for the leaders in the Vintage Faith church. Apparently, though, they have answered this in deciding that there are no ‘weaker brothers’ within the congregation who believe labyrinths are ontologically evil.

The next question would be, what business of Ken’s is this? The answer would be ‘none’. He is playing the classic role of Joe Sixpack in his La-Z-Boy, complaining about Peyton Manning’s play calling. The last time I checked, Dan wasn’t growing a hedge-maze in New Hampshire…

16   Pastor Ken Silva    http://www.apprising.org
March 27th, 2007 at 4:54 pm

“What business of Ken’s is this… The last time I checked, Dan wasn’t growing a hedge-maze in New Hampshire…”

Uh-huh, and so what business of CRN.Info’s is this? The last time I checked none of the boys here are in NH. You really do make this too easy…

17   Neil    
March 27th, 2007 at 4:55 pm

Amy,

Using a labyrinth is different, from your example, because the purpose changes.

In your example you have the Christian taking the metal to church to heal – the same purpose.

Suppose a shaman beats a drum to conjure a spirit. Later he comes to Christ. Cannot he not know use his drum to worship?

Worship – Yes.

Conjure – No

If he took the drum into church thinking it would conjure God he’s be wrong, same as your coke ring illustration. But he’s not using it to the same end. He now beats his drum to worship the Lord.

Same instrument – different purpose… that’s the difference.

Neil

18   Chris L    http://www.fishingtheabyss.com/
March 27th, 2007 at 5:01 pm

Ken,

The difference is that you have put your commentary about a local church out on the web as a blanket condemnation and slander of a brother. We are responding in the same forum in which you have made your baseless attack.

19   amy    
March 27th, 2007 at 6:51 pm

Neil,
I used a metal ring example because where I have worked those kinds of things-metal, shiny,-appear to be being used in some magic practices – a modern addition to whatever they used before.

I had thought of the weaker brother application this afternoon in connection with labyrinths, thinking through whether or not it could apply. I’m not sure that one can apply “weaker brother” principles to magic practices. 1)Eating of meat sacrificed to animals was not thought to have some magic power, or was it? 2)God still condemns magic in the NT, in spite of the weaker brother principle. But I guess as long as you aren’t going to consider that “labyrinthing” could be a magic practice, these thoughts are irrelevant.

Let’s say that a church does, rightly or wrongly, apply the weaker brother principle to labyrinths as well as to yoga, and that there is no evil in practicing these things “under Christianity.” Then I would ask, what kind of steps have they taken to educate their congregation about the dangers of yoga and walking in a labryinth outside of the church somewhere? About investigating such things on a website? It’s so easy to go on a Christian website and venture from “Christian meditative practices” to new age meditative practices, from Jesus is the way, to Jesus is one of many ways. It’s so easy to learn how to pick up a spirit guide.
__________
You’ve said: “In your example you have the Christian taking the metal to church to heal – the same purpose. Suppose a shaman beats a drum to conjure a spirit. Later he comes to Christ. Cannot he not know (now) use his drum to worship?”

A Christian who wants to heal using some pagan means would like your argument I think. But he would present it differently than you.
He would say,
1)”The shaman takes his metal to church to heal in the name of Satan. I take my metal to church to heal in the name of Jesus.” This was in fact the kind of thing that was happening in the Catholic village near us.

2)He might continue, as you have, “Suppose a shaman beats a drum to conjure a spirit. Later he comes to Christ. Cannot he not now use his drum to worship?”

I believe that 1 is okay, and 2 may or may not be okay. What is the difference? I think the difference is this. A Christian who takes his metal to church to heal is using it as a talisman. He doesn’t really believe that God can heal without this crutch. A Christian who is using his drum to worship may be doing it in an okay way or not. If he thinks that by using his drum he is manipulating God’s presence or warding off God’s wrath, as he invoked the presence of evil spirits or warded off their wrath – especially if he thinks that he HAS to play it for this to happen, then his use of the drum is wrong. He needs to be taught that it is something that can be used scripturally, to worship God. He can be taught scriptures about music in worship. If he needs to make totally new rhythms as an aid in freeing his mind from his past bondage, that’s what he needs to do. If he needs to forsake the drum forever or for a time, that’s what he needs to do.

In my thinking, the labyrinth is, for non-Christians, like #1, although the labyrinth will more than likely be only one of many ways they have of connecting with the divine, being empowered by that divine. Can a non-Christian use a labyrinth, as in #2? I personally don’t see how it applies. There are no scriptures that talk about worshipping in any set spacial pattern, unless you want to make some kind of type out of the OT outer court, inner court, Holy of Holies, etc. Whatever the case, we no longer worship at the temple. I am “in the Holy of Holies” when I pray. I don’t need to walk to the center of a labyrinth to have more intimacy, power from God. It seems like a cheap substitute for the reality.

I wonder if, under our differences in this, lies your statement, “You say that “Some non-Christians may think a power meets them in the center of a labyrinth – they’d be wrong’ and my strong belief that a power most definitely can meet them there. You later said that Satan can use anything – but I don’t think that you’ve seriously considered how much he can use labyrinths (and yoga for that matter, judging by one of your earlier comments) and how damaging it can be to the church.

Just one closing note – the Catholic village on our island was full of “Christianized” pagan practices – it was the most pitiful village I saw anywhere I worked. Some of the people practiced magic, they got “possessed,” etc. They don’t understand the power of God. They are full of fear. FEAR like you’ve probably never known, fear of the spirits around them. I see going back to copying pagan rituals as a way of inadvertently introducing people to evil spirits. All other arguments aside, if even one person in a church that is open to Christianizing pagan practices becomes oppressed by an evil spirit through those practices, it’s simply not worth it. Also, if even one person is led into thinking that all ways lead to the divine, it’s not worth it.

Surely part of being “culturally relevant” should be contextualizing scripture, strongly considering what “magic” is in the culture in which one is a part of, and trying to avoid it.

20   Chris L    http://www.fishingtheabyss.com/
March 27th, 2007 at 9:06 pm

Amy,

I’m not sure all that many people really consider labyrinth’s to be associated with ‘magical’ practices – aside from some new-age types and those looking to be offended, anyway.

As I’ve read Dan Kimball’s blog, things like this are not ordinary weekly practices at Vintage Faith, but are more like object lessons used in occasional special services for a specific purpose the demonstrating what God is like or other Christian principals.

I remember my high school youth group 20+ years ago, and there were a small percentage of our meetings that were solely focused on fellowship and having fun together. I’m sure that if you wanted to take only those nights/afternoons and hold them up to criticize that my church’s youth program was only about ‘having fun’ and was amusing us to death while neglecting Biblical teaching, you could have. But it would not have been truthful, accurate or even truly reflective of our body.

In the same way, you can pull one meditation from Mars Hill (like the ‘breathing’ talk, which, as I suspected, was given at a special shortened Memorial Day weekend service before a large celebration) and try to present it as the sum total of what Mars Hill and Rob Bell teach, but you would be highly disinjenuous and false in doing so.

This is what is being done with Dan Kimball and Vintage Faith in this particular case. It is a case of a legalistic busybody 3000 miles away from a local church criticizing the church they’ve never visited with people they’ve never known for ‘doing it all wrong’.

21   Neil    
March 28th, 2007 at 8:07 am

Amy,

I like your response to the drum question – that is “he” needs to decide. When the Gospel penetrates a culture some things will obviously change, other things are best left for “them” to decide.

I have experienced similar syncreticism among tribal peoples in Mexico.

Neil

22   Neil    
March 28th, 2007 at 8:09 am

Chris L,

This thread has diverted to a missiological discussion – your comments are correct and corrective.

Thanks

Neil