“In most places of the world, church-planters no longer follow the nineteenth-century practice of providing new converts western-imported hymn and chorus tunes with locally translated texts.  Despite relentless urbanization, the desire to track and connect with one’s ethnic roots, including indigenous melodies, rhythms, and instruments has grown enormously.  In recent decades, missions research has enabled the church to recognize this desire, which has naturally increased church and missionary interest in the culture, art, and music of people groups they want to serve…one Wycliffe Bible translator jumped to his feet and said ‘Here’s the experience of Wycliffe in two quick sentences.  In areas where translators encourage new believers to sing newly translated Scriptures, the churches grew rapidly.  Where that did not happen, churches grew more slowly.’”

 

This is an excerpt from the prelude of book All the World is Singing by Frank Fortunato as reproduced in the most recent edition of Missions Frontiers – a publication of the U. S. Center for World Missions.

It’s fitting I received this just today given the ongoing musical storm at Slice 2.0.  The basic thrust of their belief is that certain styles of music are befitting a monarch (i.e. God) and certain styles are not.  This ethnocentrism is troubling enough, but what started the storm was a declaration that those producing said inappropriate music were carnal and fleshly.  It’s one thing to dislike a musical style, it’s quite another to declare it carnal.

The truth behind the quote above is that music is to be judged as to whether it’s worthy of a worship or not.  But the criteria are not some style based external comfort value ascribed by outsiders, the judgment is content driven.

Thankfully, all across the world missionaries are realizing that their “job” is to import the Gospel into a culture, not Western Civilization – and this is finally reaching the area of worship.  Ethnomusicology is becoming a significant tool in church-planting, following the Bible translators to teach new converts how to write worship songs in their own musical styles.

This substance over style is a wonderful advancement in missiology – here’s hoping it catches on at home among the neo-fundamentalists as well.

 

  • Share/Bookmark
This entry was posted on Thursday, May 10th, 2007 at 4:14 pm and is filed under Ingrid, Legalism, Misuse of Scripture, Music and Art. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
+/- Collapse/Expand All

One Comment(+Add)

1   Russ N.    http://russ-ramblings.blogspot.com
May 10th, 2007 at 6:20 pm

Queue Steve Taylor’s “I want to be a clone” (cloneliness is next to Godliness, right?)

God will be praised by every nation, tribe, and tongue — it’s not a big leap o’ logic to see that different nations, tribes, and tongues will have different ways of praising and bringing glory to God.

I talked with a missionary to Mongolia (somewhere the church is growing rapidly) and he was in a worship service where Psalm 100 was sung as a song in the local dialect with music style and instruments found in the local culture.

I talked with a missionary to Russia (somewhere the church is growing more slowly) and they are using Western songs translated into Russian. It is only recently that they have encouraged Russians to create their own songs. Granted, there are a lot of other factors in Russia that make it difficult and slow for the church to grow…

When a local culture is introduced to Christ and western customs and traditions are “enforced” – the new convert is quickly seen as an outsider and the church will grow slowly. Christianity is seen as Western, as a destroyer of families, as a destroyer of culture — and who wants to be part of that?

When a new convert is allowed to emphasize the Christ-honoring aspects of culture and de-emphasize the non-honoring aspects of the culture, the convert is not seen as an outsider….and he or she can have much greater influence since people see tangible evidence of the difference that Christ has made in their life – it is in places like this you see Church planting movements.

But church planting movements are very messy to Western eyes with their highly decentralized structure and people who are gifted (but not trained) as pastors, shepherds, teachers rising up and leading small groups. Having said that, the SBC’s mission arm has come out in endorsement of church planting movements – so there must be something there….