…. I bet no one ever confesses sin at Ingrid’s church.

  • Share/Bookmark
This entry was posted on Saturday, August 25th, 2007 at 6:56 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
+/- Collapse/Expand All

33 Comments(+Add)

1   Chris P.    
August 25th, 2007 at 7:06 pm

So you are sending some cash to Ted??

2   Tim Reed    http://theotstrikesback.com
August 25th, 2007 at 7:34 pm

Gee Chris, I had no idea I have to either agree with what Haggard is doing, or denigrate the man in public to score political points with my readers.

3   nate    
August 25th, 2007 at 7:58 pm

If I’m not mistaken, Ted confessed and asked forgiveness. If Jesus treated Ingrid the way she treated Ted … she’d be out of luck.

Thankfully, whether or not Ingrid forgives him bears no consequence for his standing with God. For people who should be aiming to imitate and learn from Christ, we sure don’t seem to pay very much attention to the parables he told.

Matthew 18:21-35
Read it … and be humbled …

4   Chris Rosebrough    http://www.extremetheology.com
August 25th, 2007 at 8:09 pm

You lost that bet Tim.

I know for a fact that EVERY single church service at Ingrid’s church begins with a confession of sins.

So how much did you lose on that bet?

5   Tim Reed    http://theotstrikesback.com
August 25th, 2007 at 8:17 pm

Now I’m wondering how long we’ll have to wait before we get a screeching, hysterical post about the various sins that she heard confessed.

Or is that just for the kinds of sins that are never confessed in her church and for the kind of people she won’t be around?

Maybe you’d care to do the honors Chris P, after all, as you noted before in your justification, its just what the secular media would do.

6   Rick Frueh    http://judahslion.blogspot.com/
August 25th, 2007 at 8:31 pm

Is the confession the one I used to recite as a child? ….we confess that we have sinned against thee in thought, word, and deed…wherefore we flee to Thine infinite mercy, seeking and imploring Thy grace…

We used to recite it every service straight from the book. I will give you this, Chris R., that is probably more than most evangelicals do before church. A liitle perfunctory though from personal experience.

7   Will    http://onethingiknow.net
August 25th, 2007 at 9:26 pm

In this case, and I find myself amazed that I am doing so, I must agree with Ingrid. It is one thing to ask for and receive forgiveness. It is another thing altogether to send out a fundraising letter asking others to support you as you seek to further your education. I think Ingrid’s post decries this more than anything else. I think that Haggard’s attempt to ask others to take care of his family is just a step above disgraceful. He should do what he can to to provide for them even if it means he has to forego his educational pursuits for the time being.

I have no problem forgivng Haggard (although I do find it hard to believe that 3 weeks in therapy – no matter how intensive – has completely cured him of his homosexual desires). What I find unforgivable (until he repents of this) is the kind of fundraising attempts that he employs in his letter that tell would-be supporters that their rewards will be great in heaven if they send him a few bucks.

Of course, I could be wrong.

8   Rick Frueh    http://judahslion.blogspot.com/
August 25th, 2007 at 9:32 pm

Will – you are right, it is unseemly. The best thing to do is when you get the request in the mail check the box “$0.00.

9   Tim Reed    http://theotstrikesback.com
August 25th, 2007 at 9:48 pm

Will,
This isn’t about siding with Ingrid or Haggard. I’m perfectly comfortable with saying that I’m not going to donate to Haggard and I’d discourage anyone else from doing so (at least those who don’t have a personal relationship with him) and from saying Ingrid’s post was un-Christlike. I don’t think its much of a stretch to say that Ingrid is deliberately kicking a guy when he’s down for the delight of her readers. Its no different than going to temple to thank God that she’s not like the dirty, dirty sinner over there.

10   nathan    http://www.nathanneighbour.com
August 25th, 2007 at 10:33 pm

Christians are the only people I know who eat their own, and really enjoy doing it.

11   Will    http://onethingiknow.net
August 25th, 2007 at 11:52 pm

Ingrid may very well be kicking a man while he is down. She has done it before. And her post has a stridency to it that is very un-Christlike. But I guess one issue this raises for me has to do with true repentance and facing the consequences of our sinfulness.

Haggard’s confession reminds me a little of other preachers who have fallen and subsequently tried to mitigate the consequences of their behaviors by appealing to the grace of God. That is, since God has forgiven me, you need to do the same, and this basically means there should be few, if any, consequences for the betrayal of my pastoral office.

Now unlike some, Bakker and Swaggert come to mind, Haggard actually stepped down from his pulpit. He did go through some therapy, and he has had experienced some serious repurcussions from his sin. But even so, I wonder if Bonhoeffer’s understanding of “cheap grace” comes into play here.

Now please understand, I don’t know exactly what it is I am trying to say, and I do not want to mitigate the efficacy of God’s grace, but this is what I am pondering at this moment.

12   Chris P.    
August 26th, 2007 at 12:44 am

Get real.
Haggard is unrepentant. Asking for money is all the evidence that is needed. Asking for forgiveness is not repentance.

What I see here is alot of self righteous bilge. The whole agenda here is anti-Ingrid and Ken. The pious “pray for your brother” blether is staged.
BTW you are assuming to know Ingrid’s motives (something you accuse her of doing to others); to score brownie points? Spare me. I assume that most who read her blog already support her views as their own.
Who is denigrating the man in public? This “pastor” has the cojones to ask for cash after humiliating his church, and his family. He is making a public spectacle of himself.
I said this same on your other post. There are enough people getting their news on the church from all kinds of media, so quit acting like the christian bloggers are the ones “outing” these idiots. You are dipensing more disinformation than anybody else.

13   Ian    http://lostintheheartofsomewhere.blogspot.com/
August 26th, 2007 at 2:04 am

Chris

Ted Haggard should go out, get a job and study part-time like any other person. To that extent, Ingrid is correct. However, the TONE of her article, and the very fact she felt it appropriate to post it is very wrong and she needs to repent.

14   iggy    http://wordofmouthministries.blogspot.com/
August 26th, 2007 at 2:53 am

Chris P,

“What I see here is alot of self righteous bilge. The whole agenda here is anti-Ingrid and Ken.”

You miss that are aim is restoration, not condemnation… can you honestly say that of Ken as he condemned me here on this very blog? Can you honestly state you know that Ingrid’s hope for Haagard is that he be restored and reinstated to ministry to the Glory of God?

I guess one can defend and see what they want, yet my motive is always restoration… for Ken and for Ingrid.

Be Blessed,
iggy

15   David C    http://davidcho.blogspot.com
August 26th, 2007 at 3:36 am

Well, in places like Ingrid’s church, people DO confess their “sins.”

But most of their confessed sins involve being too soft on the Emergents, Purpose Driven churches, gays, lesbians, bi-sexuals, transsexuals, feminists, Democrats, liberals, etc. etc.

16   Tim Reed    http://theotstrikesback.com
August 26th, 2007 at 5:59 am

Chris P,

Haggard is unrepentant. Asking for money is all the evidence that is needed. Asking for forgiveness is not repentance.

Or he could be scared and desperate.

BTW you are assuming to know Ingrid’s motives (something you accuse her of doing to others);

When have I done that? While its possible, I don’t think I have, though I have questioned her reasons for questioning someone’s motives.

I said this same on your other post. There are enough people getting their news on the church from all kinds of media, so quit acting like the christian bloggers are the ones “outing” these idiots.

Yes Chris P, we know that you’re perfectly comfortable with taking your cues from secular media rather than from scripture.

17   Rick Frueh    http://judahslion.blogspot.com/
August 26th, 2007 at 6:08 am

Brother Haggard may have repented of some of his personal sins, but he obviously hasn’t realized he needs to repent of the entire system he was in. The whole sordid mess did damage to the cause of Christ, and this latest fundraising thing just confirms to the world that Christianity is a scam.

But when it comes to spreading the news of something like this, less is more. And Ingrid’s dramatic “I don’t usually use bold letters but I’m going to break my own rules” because she is so mad she can’t help it, is melodramatic and draws attention to herself. Her grandfather did this and that and everything else she writes draws attention to herself and presents the picture that her righteousness has been so offended by this she cannot control her anger, and of course God is with her.

Let us be grateful to God that the secular press will continue to feed our insatiable appetite for Christian dirt on anyone and everyone they can. And showing our outrage will substatiate how incredibly righteous we are, and we thank all the secular papers for allowing us to link to them. These are the same papers that traffic alcohol, abortion clinics, immoral movies, xxx places, and generally are no friend to our Christ.

But in these cases where they provide a needed service for gossip and dirt, we humbly thank you.

And it is so sweet to provide a comment section so that after reading a personal tirade against these reports and providing a family backdrop of comparison, everyone can say “You are soooo right”. And the lemmings can only dream of one day ascending to the rarified air of the Emerald City of BlogThronedom, where the dirt is carried up into the inner sanctdom, excitedly sifted through, packaged, and sent down the mountain to be served to the serfs complete with the monarch’s editorial garnish. And once you get the subject used to eating dirt, nothing else will satisfy.

Phil.4:8 – Finally brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of godd report, if there be any virtue, and if there be any praise, think on these things.

And what came to my mind is that if Mr. Haggard is a believer, one day his presence in heaven will redound to the glory of the grace of God. Come to think of it, so will all of us who should never be there!

18   DT    http://dead-theologians.blogspot.com/
August 26th, 2007 at 6:27 am

Everyone,

Chris P. has hit the nail on the head. You cannot comfort someone in their sin and do kingdom’s work.

DT

19   Rick Frueh    http://judahslion.blogspot.com/
August 26th, 2007 at 6:35 am

DT – And with that we all agree. You have missed the point again. Is it on purpose?

20   DT    http://dead-theologians.blogspot.com/
August 26th, 2007 at 6:53 am

Rick,

You said “You have missed the point again”

When did I miss it the first time?

You miss everything that I am saying on this site.

We are fundamentally opposed to each other’s purpose for a site. This site (look at it in the “About” section) is here to correct errors that CRN and SOL have conveyed and to encourage prayer for the poor souls that the above mentioned groups are castigating.

Our sites are wanting to call out and correct the error of false teachers, full-blown cults and compromising groups. The way we do it might sting but it has to be done. You can keep praying for the above mentioned groups and remain silent in your defense for the truth and you are only half right.

DT

21   Joe Martino    http://joemartino.name
August 26th, 2007 at 7:08 am

I can’t believe I’m about to type these words….I agree with Ingrid. I’m going to school and I’m not sending out letters asking strangers to support me. While her post is “rantish” it is her blog. I mean if one of us posted this on our own personal blog (See David Cho’s post about the SBC’s new courses for women) I doubt any of us would have even noted it.
I don’t ever remember hearing Haggard repent. I remember him getting caught and that’s it. I’m not saying we should castigate him. I am saying what he did with this letter is dumb.
I know what it’s like to have zero money and go to school b/c you believe that is what God called you to do. I know what it’s like to wonder, “OK God, which bill am I not going to pay on time this month.”
Maybe it would do Haggard some good to learn some of those life lessons.
Ok, I’m off to pray with my apostate, new evangelical, how did DT put it?…spiritual deficient church leaders church leaders before the service today.

22   Rick Frueh    http://judahslion.blogspot.com/
August 26th, 2007 at 7:12 am

DT – I have expressed my concerns over Rick Warren, MacLaren, and the purpose/emergent/ seeker movements and their direction many times. So has Chris L..

But if you are going to confront error, you must also confront the error of self righteousness, misrepresentation, and personal invectives as practiced by the home crowd. We do not have the luxury to choose who we will reprove, we must reprove all unChristlikeness including when it surfaces in our own lives.

It is invigorating to verbally confront doctrinal error, but not as easy to see and confront behavioral error in those within the “camp”. To live and speak Christ is a constant balance of boldness and meekness, correction and comfort, grace and truth, and the Spirit’s empowerment to expose the sin in others and the Spirit’s enpowerment to expose the sin in ourselves.

That path leads all the way to the cross.

23   Chris Rosebrough    http://www.extremetheology.com
August 26th, 2007 at 8:51 am

Joe is right.

When I was getting my masters degree I was working 50 hours a week and taking 8 to 10 units of course work at the same time. I never asked anyone for a penny so that I could ‘quit’ my job and only do school.

If Ted needs money its because he doesn’t have a real job. I find it hard to believe that no one will employ him. He basically wants to be a welfare case and not have to work hard like the rest of us.

24   ianmcn    
August 26th, 2007 at 8:51 am

This site looses its purpose and effectiveness with posts like the above. You may disagree with how Ingrid worded the post, but surely no one can deny she has a point?! A man has betrayed and embarrassed not only himself, his family and his church, but also the entire evangelical church of America – and now he’s asking for money for his own professional development! If the reports are accurate, that is disgraceful. Can anyone on this site really defend that?

This site is a necessary antidote to the lies and slander that are posted on CRN/SoL, but posts like the above are scraping the barrel for things to criticize – the very thing Ken and Ingrid are so often accused of doing.

25   Tim Reed    http://theotstrikesback.com
August 26th, 2007 at 12:20 pm

This site looses its purpose and effectiveness with posts like the above.

I disagree completely. This site serves its purpose as defender of brothers and sisters who are unfairly attacked. That’s exactly what this is. Like it or not Haggard is a brother, and this is an unfair attack. In this case its been mostly in tone, rather than the general stance taken. I believe that’s the case here.

Our sites are wanting to call out and correct the error of false teachers, full-blown cults and compromising groups. The way we do it might sting but it has to be done.

Doing things in an improper way is still having wrong doctrine. you can’t sit there and say “it might sting but its right”. That’s not what scripture teaches. It talks about gentleness and controlling the tongue, do you see that in Ingrid’s words?

I agree with Ingrid. I’m going to school and I’m not sending out letters asking strangers to support me. While her post is “rantish” it is her blog. I mean if one of us posted this on our own personal blog (See David Cho’s post about the SBC’s new courses for women) I doubt any of us would have even noted it.

Joe, I think you’re wrong. I would hope that if one of us were as high profile as Ingrid and dropped a disgusting post like that we’d be called out on it. If you’re right that’s not a credit to what was done here, its a discredit to Christians.

I also agree that people shouldn’t be supporting him. At least in this manner. People who know him personally might be another matter.

Look, I never said anywhere that this was proper. Somehow people are getting the idea that pointing out that what Ingrid did was improper means I support Haggard 100% in everything he does. That’s simply not the case. Right now this guy has a world of judgment coming down on him (BTW, he’s “attending” the University of Phoenix, which is exclusively online, now why would a guy want that? Could it be that he just wants to to crawl in a hole and pull it in after him?) and while I expect that from non-Christians a little bit more discretion from Christians can be expected. James tells us that mercy should triumph over judgment. Do you see that anywhere in Ingrid’s post?

Speaking of Ingrid’s post I find it interesting that there’s not a scrap of scripture to be found. The only source of authority I see Ingrid appealing to is her grandfather embodying certain American values.

26   Joe Martino    http://joemartino.name
August 26th, 2007 at 12:51 pm

Tim,
I think your confusing your dislike of Ingrid’s normal posts with this post. What did she say that was wrong? I can almost see your point in that her blog is a “professional blog” but honestly, I don’t see anything wrong with her post. She goes a bit far with the whole “his well honed charm” thing but honestly she’s just pointing out that this whole idea is nuts.
Why does she need Scripture for that? There’s not a scrap of Scripture in this post either. I’m not trying to piss you off, I’m just saying that if I had found this news article without her I probably would have written something on my own personal blog about it. I may even have written about it here. I probably wouldn’t have ranted like she did (but I may have).
She’s wrong a lot. She’s unnecessarily mean a lot. She’s incredibly obnoxious and pretentious a lot, but in this post I think she’s well within bounds of Christian decency.

27   Tim Reed    http://theotstrikesback.com
August 26th, 2007 at 2:24 pm

Joe,
I doubt you’ll piss me off by disagreeing with me, this may be one circumstance where we have to agree to disagree. I don’t see Ingrid’s post as in the bounds of Christian decency, I just see another screechy, self-righteous post in a whole string of them. It might be the use of the term narcissist, or the all caps asking of “HAS THE MAN NO DECENCY”, or the continued and incessant worship of her family, but I wouldn’t characterize this post as decent or Christian.

I understand what Haggard has done is inappropriate, but I see a desperate, hurting guy and I don’t think the way that Ingrid has piled on here as Christian decency. I also don’t see having that reaction as conducive to fostering an environment where people confess their sins and repent.

28   Rick Frueh    http://judahslion.blogspot.com/
August 26th, 2007 at 2:52 pm

Guys – Ingrid’s point about Haggard’s fundraising is correct.

But:

1. She would never know it except for the secular press who reported it I’m sure not to promote the cause of Christ.

2. Her post is filled with self serving examples of what real work is.

3. Her post is filled with anger

4. She becomes melodramatic with her “capitals” use

5. Haggard is an easy target. He has no credibility and let’s face it he’s grasping at straws.

Like finding a badly beaten man in an alley, beaten by men who he foolishly borrowed money from, and you call people to come watch you kick him some more. Leave Haggard alone, I would guess his worst days may lie ahead so showing indignation concerning his behavior is only self serving. He’s been removed from office, he’s just begun to experience God’s correction. He still may lose his family.

Like I said before, when men have been so stripped of any respect, we should not desire to know, much less spread, any more about him.
Oh yea, except some information that will help us pray for him (extreme satire)

29   ianmcn    
August 26th, 2007 at 4:25 pm

I understand what Haggard has done is inappropriate, but I see a desperate, hurting guy

You’re probably right, but regardless of what state he’s in, to use his ministry supporters to fund his personal reinvention is a public disgrace – not a private indiscretion. If it is all true as reported, he needs to be called out for it publicly.

I can understand people’s disagreement with the tone Ingrid uses, but if there’s truth behind what she’s saying for once, then can’t we cut her some slack?! Besides, the post is misleading and sensationalized (something Ingrid is often called out for), it is nothing to do with him confessing sin – it is to do with him swindling honest, caring supporters of their hard earned money for personal purposes.

30   David C    http://davidcho.blogspot.com
August 26th, 2007 at 4:28 pm

So while most of us agree that Ingrid’s post is rantish and Haggard’s fundraise problematic, we are still divided over how we react.

Reaction 1: Ingrid’s post is self-serving and rantish, BUT she is correct about Haggard’s post-fall behavior.

Reaction 2: Ingrid’s is correct about Haggard’s post-fall behavior, BUT her attitude reeks.

31   Rick Frueh    http://judahslion.blogspot.com/
August 26th, 2007 at 4:31 pm

David – very funny.

I’m going with #1 and #2 !

32   Tim Reed    http://theotstrikesback.com
August 26th, 2007 at 8:50 pm

I can understand people’s disagreement with the tone Ingrid uses, but if there’s truth behind what she’s saying for once, then can’t we cut her some slack?!

That’s kind of the point though, you can’t do the right thing in the wrong way and pretend like its all good. Ingrid could be right on every issue, and do it in a smarmy, self-righteous, nasty way, that wouldn’t mean we should allow her to go on sinning against brothers and sisters.

Besides, the post is misleading and sensationalized (something Ingrid is often called out for), it is nothing to do with him confessing sin – it is to do with him swindling honest, caring supporters of their hard earned money for personal purposes.

First, there was nothing misleading about it, there was very little actual information in it to begin with, and really it was all opinion so I’m not sure how you can it was misleading. And, while I consider it wrong, I wouldn’t put what Haggard is doing in the category of swindling because they’re being upfront. Unreasonable, yes, but at least unreasonably upfront.

33   Sandman    
August 27th, 2007 at 12:48 am

Talk about doing the right thing for the wrong reasons.

The more I read of Ingrid, the more of a caricature she becomes. More and more I think of her as the new Church Lady–except it’s not funny!

While there are many things on which she and I can agree, I can’t help but get the impression that with her comes a type of piety that suggests misery = holiness.

If you can enjoy your chuch’s family night with a comedian who is a Christian, then you’re probably a false convert who hasn’t spent enough time in sackcloth and ashes over the millions of lives lost to abortion.