Mike Ratliff has written an excellent post on “Limited Atonement” which you can read here. I consider it to be excellent because Mike is clearly concerned about presenting a balanced and fair explanation of not only the monergist/synergist debate but also strives to show how monergism allows for man’s free will when understood against the backdrop of his earlier post on “unconditional election”. He concludes with a summary statement that I am in full agreement with:
The doctrines of grace is a Soteriological view that is highly misunderstood, even by many Calvinists. Many have a tendency to remove Man’s Responsibility to believe and repent to the point of not offering the Gospel freely to all. To do that is the result of dishonest interpretation of clear Biblical texts. On the other hand, most Synergists’ Soteriological views remove the Sovereignty of God and seem to elevate man to that position. Can you see how each extreme is out of balance? The correct view of our incredible Salvation is one in which God is glorified and man cannot boast. (Ephesians 2:8-9)
Amen! I think Mike has gone a long ways towards helping both sides to see that we are alot closer in our beliefs than sometimes the “extreme” viewpoints would have us believe. I heartily concur with his statement:
I believe that many of the Synergistic and Monergistic disputes are born from prideful arguments that have little to do with describing and defining the truth.
Towards glorifying God and not allowing man to boast, and also in the interests of promoting synergy across “many aisles” I thought the following might be of interest to those who wonder what our Catholic friends have to say about the subject of faith. They also attempt to balance God’s sovereign role in faith with man’s free will:
Faith is a Grace
When St. Peter confessed that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the living God, Jesus declared to him that this revelation did not come “from flesh and blood,” but from “my Father who is in heaven.” Faith is a gift of God, a supernatural virtue infused by him. “Before this faith can be exercised, man must have the grace of God to move and assist him; he must have the interior helps of the Holy Spirit, who moves the heart and converts it to God, who opens the eyes of the mind and ‘makes it easy for all to accept and believe the truth.’”
Faith is a human act
Believing is possible only by grace and the interior helps of the Holy Spirit. But it is no less true that believing is an authentically human act. Trusting in God and cleaving to the truths he has revealed are contrary neither to human freedom nor to human reason.
In faith, the human intellect and will cooperate with divine grace: “Believing is an act of the intellect assenting to the divine truth by command of the will moved by God through grace.”
Faith and Understanding
What moves us to believe is not the fact that revealed truths appear as true and intelligible in the light of our natural reason: we believe “because of the authority of God himself who reveals them, who can neither deceive nor be deceived.”
Interesting isn’t it? What divides us is, in many cases, inconsequential to what should be uniting us, our mutual faith in our one Lord and Savior who made it possible for us to be reconciled to God.





![The Prodigal God (An Unabridged Production)[2-CD Set]; Recovering the Heart of the Christian Faith Image of The Prodigal God (An Unabridged Production)[2-CD Set]; Recovering the Heart of the Christian Faith](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/31Jl6fhDLxL._SL75_.jpg)

6 Comments(+Add)
Yes, John, it was a very fair and balanced treatise concerning a controversial subject. I appreciate you bringing it to our attention here. Mike loves the Lord.
This very thing has been a subject that I have spent a great deal of time thinking on. Indeed there must be both God’s sovererienty and mans free will (choosing to believe or reject the truth). The Bible declares both plainly without appology. If we can actually and completely understand all these things dosen’t that in a sense diminish “the just shall live by his faith”?
God is glorified when men believe, it seems to me if it is 100% God, where is the glory He so rightly deserves? Please don’t take that wrong, it just me trying to work these things out in my heart and mind. God has a legal right to do with His creation as He pleases.
With Peter, in Matt. 16, when the Lord Jesus asked him whom do you say that I am? And he answered “you are the Christ, Son of the living God.” Jesus answered him and said; “Blessed art
thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not
revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in
heaven.” Can this be used as an example? God, the Holy Spirit testified this truth to Peter, at that time could Peter have choosen to reject this truth? I find this to be used in comparison to us when we believe unto salvation, without the Spirit of God testifing to our spirit the truth concerning His Son, isn’t it at that point when we either believe or reject truth? God is not making me believe, He is though, revealing truth which I would otherwise have no way of knowing, allowing me at that point to accept or reject it as truth. It also is not a work, but believing is a condition of my heart, right?
That’s the best I can do, this gets way over my head sometimes. But thanks be to God He alone is in control!
And let it be known, that this site has now posted opposite views. I wonder if there is any other blog that can claim that kind of open dialogue?
Though this is a post that agree with Mike… his name is spelled wrong in the post.
Just letting someone know.
iggy
Just so you know, Scientist have now found the “free will spot” of the brain. I think that settles it. Actually, you know what is funny I’ve actually had two different watchdogs accuse me of being a freewiller and a fiver pointer respectively. Kind of funny.
Joe Martino,
Actually, you know what is funny I’ve actually had two different watchdogs accuse me of being a freewiller and a fiver pointer respectively.
Hmmm sounds a little double minded to me! LOL!
Funny thing to me is that when I speak of eternal security of the believer my Arminian friends get nervous and antsy… yet do not condemn me… yet when I speak of free will they cheer and my Calvinist friends condemn me… and all I wonder is which one seems to have more a grasp on the grace and mercy of God?
Blessings,
iggy