Christianity is an exclusive religion. If it is true it has no partners no matter how close.

 

Jazz – yea, very funny and true. The miracle of Saturday we pray will be duplicated this Saturday. Boy I wish we had another shot at Penn State and Purdue, both revealed as pretenders. And Joe Pa, a catholic traitor! Go Irish – the super race. I am first generation Irish/German. My brother and his family live in Munich and his twin lives outside New Your City where I was saved. The one in New Jeresy is born again but the one in Germany is not. I came to be a Notre Dame fan growing up in a half Irish family and I attended some IRA fundraisers in the 1970’s.

Joe Montana, Bettis, Tim Brown, Waters, Golic, and all the rest. National championships from a diminutive school whose scholastic and moral standards preclude them from recruiting as heavily as the other schools. And they believe in baptismal regeneration and transubstantiation both. There are a lot of blogs they could “warm up” to!!

I feel like having some fun today, look out – incoming!!! 

The main assumption i make here is that any religion that is a true religion has the entire truth with it. Religions that are exclusive in nature, cannot all be true. There can exist, however, one that is true and all the remaining hence must be false. What about religions that are inclusive in nature. If the included religions are exclusive in their claims,we have an inherent contradiction. If they arent, then each religion by itself is not self contained hence they cannot be individually true. On the other hand, an inclusive religion if true, should contain the truth that it is a religion that has the entire truth. But then any true inclusive religion, that makes no such claim, must make such a claim, resulting in a contradiction. It starts out by saying that no one religion has the truth but all religions have the truth with them, but ends up saying it has the truth with it. Hence any religion that is inclusive in nature cannot be true. Because we know that truth exists, it is only to be found in a religion that is exclusive in its claims.

This paragraph makes my head spin. It seems like some sort of tongue-twister, really.

I’ll just let that sink in without further comment. Let me know when you all start laughing.–

lol lol lol!!

I’ll just let that sink in without further comment. Let me know when you all start laughing.

GO BUCKS!!!

Now theres some heresy!

I was baptized as a baby, then was baptized later when i was in my early twenties… So I am more saved than many! LOL!

Yet, it seems to me that the scirpture teaches us that it is the Resurrection that saves us… The baptism is of the Holy Spirit (not anything to do with speaking in tongues) is what seals the deal…

Be Blessed,
iggy

But I was not baptized until two years later. So I know that the teaching that baptism saves is false, I was born again two years before I was baptized. It is a ceremonial carryover from Rome which carried it over from the law. People like Tim do not actually say baptism saves, they add some other importance to it but not salvation.

To his credit, Chris Rosebrough is the only man honest and bold enough to post about it. And if I read his bio correctly he did not always believe it. Go ahead and baptize infants or teens or adults as an outward sign of the covenant, but once you say that baptism saves you have crossed the line.

You are a rotten filthy liar. We are never just sprinkled, we ARE the crowd. There are only two kinds of college football fans. Those that are Notre Dame fans, and those that wish they were.

Just an observation from being at the games over the years:

1) If the opposing fans are drunk, but subdued, you’re playing against Illinois.

2) If the opposing fans are sprinkled throughout the crowd, are drunk, loud and obnoxious, you’re playing against Notre Dame.

3) If the opposing fans are sprinkled throughout the crowd, are drunk, loud and obnoxious, and you have to cover your children’s ears, you’re playing against Ohio State.

4) If the opposing fans are sprinkled throughout the crowd, are drunk, loud and obnoxious, puke in the isles, and you have to cover your children’s ears, you’re playing against Wisconsin.

5) If the opposing fans are sprinkled throughout the crowd, are drunk and complain about their team as much as about yours, they’re from a Michigan school.

6) If the opposing fans are so polite you don’t know they’re there, as they’re biding their time before you work for them, you’re playing Northwestern.

7) If the opposing fans slink out before halftime to avoid the shame of being seen, you’re playing IU.

If the opposing fans appear to be snooty frat boys who get plastered and make donkeys of themselves after the game, you’re playing Penn State.