looks like the elusive editor keeps getting Ken Silva all tied up in trouble 
 Read Ken trying to get outta this one. Isn’t the GENERAL editor the one responsible for the information being put out by their publication?
Also, I am trying to figure out how we misconstrued the point of a four line satire article. Pretty funny stuff.
This entry was posted
on Monday, October 29th, 2007 at 6:56 pm and is filed under Editor, Ken Silva, Linked Articles, ODM Writers.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
![Image of The Prodigal God (An Unabridged Production)[2-CD Set]; Recovering the Heart of the Christian Faith](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/31Jl6fhDLxL._SL75_.jpg "The Prodigal God (An Unabridged Production)[2-CD Set]; Recovering the Heart of the Christian Faith")
12 Comments(+Add)
Now Chris P told all of us that we could just look along the side bar and attribute it to any of the listed authors we wanted to. I guess its just another watchdoggie deception.
If Ken would just eliminate any anonymous postings, there wouldn’t be any more misunderstandings. Ken, could you please explain the rationale of having an anonymous account where people can post things without any accountability? Wouldn’t transparency be the best policy here?
And yes, Ken, being that you are the general editor, you are ultimately responsible for anything said by the other authors … ESPECIALLY when they post anonymously.
Ken Silva is the head of CRN… he is the Capt’n…
I think it rather funny that he has to defend himself as not writing it and yet no one is man enough to own it!
If Ken did not write it and all he is doing is trying to correct Todd… well Ken misses a great big point!!!! Ken heads up that ministry… so if he allows it to be said he is in a general agreement to it. Also, since no one man’s up to the post, then all one can do is think… this is Ken’s site, he runs it… he approved of the post… so Ken is to blame.
The way around that is to post your stupid name to your own stupid post and be a man about it… or woman… oh wait it seems the women there that post are more willing to put there names to their posts… so the women are more men then the men!
LOL!
Now that is priceless!
be blessed,
iggy
I am accountable to the others at CRN, to my church which I serve, to the Body of Christ at large, and to the Lord. It is irrelevant if you know who is posting what since you are already going to disagree with it regardless.
What a crock.
It is more tha possible that the one who posted the article never reads this blog. You are assuming (arrogantly) that all the contributors at CRN even bother to come here and see what rhetoric you are fertilizing the lawn with today.
are you serious Chris? This has nothing to do with being personally accountable. This is about putting a name to your work. If you are so afraid to put your name on a piece, there is a problem. There is NO reason to have an elusive “editor” other than to hide behind a moniker.
Looks like you show up to see what rhetoric we are fertilizing the lawn with today
And from the wonderful CRN response, others do as well.
Chris P,
You told us to “take our pick” of listed authors who write for C?N.com if we wanted to assign authorship to the anonymous coward posting as “editor”. Now it seems that’s not the case at all. Now you’re claiming that there’s no responsibility for anything that appears on C?N.com because you serve your local church. Which is it? Because that’s the fastest flip flop I’ve ever seen from a non-presidential candidate.
Ken is a heretic! Chris P. is a man loving neo-evangelical!
I’m just keeping the remnant informed.
Chris P,
WOW what a lie! i have at least two kudos I have given to CRN writers… so you are lying when you say we will disagree with it regardless….
Let me see, I see that Todd manned up and apologized while Ken “teaching” us so “pastorally” called Todd names… real mature stuff coming out of CRN…
Chris P you are a parody of your own self… if you could get rid of that hate we might have a real conversation… that hate will only harm you and not anyone else!
be blessed,
iggy
Somehow, the concept of “The Editor” just doesn’t thrill me like the concept of “put your John Hancock right here.”
The Editor: Editing nothing and hiding behind everything.
ChrisP.
Wow.
You’re accountable to CRN?
Great. Accountable to people who never admit even the most obvious of mistakes, mischaracterizations, etc. That’s comforting.
You’re accountable to the church you serve at?
Well…considering your church’s vision statement in light of the purpose driven, emergent madness that compromises with the world…I’d say by CRN standards you’re in deep weeds. Consider the following:
Chris P’s church…exists to win people to Jesus Christ and bring them to his eternal family through membership, to see them grow to Christ-like maturity, and equip them to effectively fulfill the mission of evengelizing (sic) the world and ministry to the Church to use whatever means necessary to fulfill his mandate for us in order to magnify his name.
exists to win people to Jesus Christ=evangelism
bring them to…membership=fellowship
to see them grow to Christ-like maturity=discipleship
and equip them to effectively fulfill the mission=ministry
in order to magnify his name=worship
Can you say, “Purpose Driven”?
You’re accountable to the Body of Christ?
Well then CRN.info is a place for you to come to check yourself.
I’m glad this expression of the Body is here to be available to you to assist you in your growth in humility…ready to put your money where your mouth is? If you and your friends are so right on about things, why the big ol’ chip and tantrums?
You’re accountable to the Lord?
Well that’s just great. Who isn’t?
People here at CRN regularly apologize and admit they are wrong about things said or written.
Can you say the same about your precious Ken, Ingrid, et. al?
Or is that just being vicious? arrogant?
or maybe…just maybe….
that’s just the facts.
So I’ve been in this ODM “game” for a several months and the more I read the more I get the sense that Ken, Ingrid, et. al are jealous. The truth is not important!
It reminds me of this guy who was building this wall and 3 people stood on top of the wall and heaved down vitriol and critique that was unfounded.