Comments on: False Dichotomy and Anonymous Cowardice

By: nc

nc — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 01:38:07 +0000

Once again, drunk on Whine.
These posts are theology laden, but not theology rich.
That is unless you’re posting by copy/pasting the theological formulations of one 200 year period of other people completely dependent on the very “apostates” they reject…

Kevin,

ouch. chain letter? that’s funny.

By: Tim Reed

Tim Reed — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:08:45 +0000

Rick,
The idea of a secret Calvinist handshakes made me giggle a little bit. Errr, not giggled, laughed, yes, a manly belly laugh of epic proportions. Definently not giggled.

By: Kevin I

Kevin I — Mon, 26 Nov 2007 20:28:12 +0000

I have to say that this post was especially out there and confusing even for the watchdoggies.

It smelled of all the truth, accuracy and helpfulness of a chain letter. But I guess false dichotomies are in bounds over there.

By: Rick Frueh

Rick Frueh — Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:27:09 +0000

The anonomous request is intriguing. Does the author believe his house will be bombed or is he a freemason? The five solas, are they related to the Jackson Five?

Is there any deeper theological idolatry than Calvinisn? They have their own names, their own heroes, their own solas, and an accepted invisible membership card recognized by the fraternity itself. Even if every tenent of Calvinism is completely true, the ambiance generated by the doctrinal bourgeoisie toward the proletariat has kept the ranks thinned to a manageable level.

I say with Ghandi – “If it were not for Calvinists I would have become one”. (probably not)