<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: once again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prophets-priests-poets.info/2008/01/31/once-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prophets-priests-poets.info/2008/01/31/once-again/</link>
	<description>Engaging the depths of God and life in the Kingdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:27:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Greathouse</title>
		<link>http://prophets-priests-poets.info/2008/01/31/once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-48383</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Greathouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christianresearchnetwork.info/2008/01/31/once-again/#comment-48383</guid>
		<description>Thanks. Now, I feel a little dumb that it was in the glossary section. i should have put 2 and 2 together.

Thanks for the directions, greatly appreciative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. Now, I feel a little dumb that it was in the glossary section. i should have put 2 and 2 together.</p>
<p>Thanks for the directions, greatly appreciative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris L</title>
		<link>http://prophets-priests-poets.info/2008/01/31/once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-48376</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christianresearchnetwork.info/2008/01/31/once-again/#comment-48376</guid>
		<description>ODM = Online &quot;Discernment&quot; Ministry (see our Glossary in the Upper-Left for more acronyms &amp; such...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ODM = Online &#8220;Discernment&#8221; Ministry (see our Glossary in the Upper-Left for more acronyms &#038; such&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Greathouse</title>
		<link>http://prophets-priests-poets.info/2008/01/31/once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-48375</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Greathouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christianresearchnetwork.info/2008/01/31/once-again/#comment-48375</guid>
		<description>Can you help me out ?

I see in this comment and the other comment about Brian&#039;s post the acronym ODM, what does this refer to ?

I, personally, do not see where and why people are upset with him on his &quot;three-stool&quot; approach at he world meeting.

We have an opportunity to make a lot of the yuckiness of this world go away. If we has faith groups, private sectors and the goverment all teamed up; we could end a lot of the worlds problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you help me out ?</p>
<p>I see in this comment and the other comment about Brian&#8217;s post the acronym ODM, what does this refer to ?</p>
<p>I, personally, do not see where and why people are upset with him on his &#8220;three-stool&#8221; approach at he world meeting.</p>
<p>We have an opportunity to make a lot of the yuckiness of this world go away. If we has faith groups, private sectors and the goverment all teamed up; we could end a lot of the worlds problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.G.</title>
		<link>http://prophets-priests-poets.info/2008/01/31/once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-48311</link>
		<dc:creator>M.G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 06:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christianresearchnetwork.info/2008/01/31/once-again/#comment-48311</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really confused.  Warren was contrasting secularism with religious pluralism.  If the ODMs think the alternative to secularism is the existence of a one-world religion, does that mean they are in favor of secularism?

Is the goal of ODMs to get the U.S. to be more like France?  Where religion lives in the shadow of the State?  

Or is the goal theocracy, where perhaps Christianity is totally free from government interference, but other religions are suppressed or completely banned?    

In other words, I am completely and totally baffled that the ODMs would take issue with an argument against secularism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really confused.  Warren was contrasting secularism with religious pluralism.  If the ODMs think the alternative to secularism is the existence of a one-world religion, does that mean they are in favor of secularism?</p>
<p>Is the goal of ODMs to get the U.S. to be more like France?  Where religion lives in the shadow of the State?  </p>
<p>Or is the goal theocracy, where perhaps Christianity is totally free from government interference, but other religions are suppressed or completely banned?    </p>
<p>In other words, I am completely and totally baffled that the ODMs would take issue with an argument against secularism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

