From Brant over at Letters from Kamp Krusty:
One more thing: I heard Ward Broehm speak last week in Washington. I won’t forget what he said.
What is God’s plan to PROVE His love for an AIDS orphan?
What is God’s plan to PROVE His love for a lonely widow?
What is God’s plan to PROVE His love to a new mother who’s baby is dying of malnutrition?
What is God’s plan to PROVE His love to the AIDS sufferer, in his final days?
Answer: We are.
…and there is no Plan B.
This entry was posted
on Wednesday, February 13th, 2008 at 11:00 am and is filed under Church and Society.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.



![The Prodigal God (An Unabridged Production)[2-CD Set]; Recovering the Heart of the Christian Faith Image of The Prodigal God (An Unabridged Production)[2-CD Set]; Recovering the Heart of the Christian Faith](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/31Jl6fhDLxL._SL75_.jpg)



65 Comments(+Add)
Wow, pretty hard-hitting. Very practical. In fact, too practical. I prefer to remain comfortable in my lofty realm of theoretical abstraction divorced from reality.
John 3:
16″For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.”
Sounds like the plan to me.
He didn’t say start social welfare agencies and all will be saved. Always treating the symptoms and never the disease. That is akin to having a ‘form” of godliness yet denying its power.
Isaiah 58 is talking to God’s people not everyone.
Only the Body can do the work that the Head commands. So I would qualify the word “we”.
God proved his love for us that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.
Proof.
Chris – A muslim can do what those Scriptures command. We must always do those things “in Jesus name” and in the context of the gospel message and Christ’s redemption or we run the real risk of communicating God’s love without the necessary context of Jn.3:16.
Humanitarian acts are the fruits of a Christian but they are not the path to salvation in a vacuum. Ministering to human needs must be connected in some way with ministering to the soul.
Hey! Is it time for the weekly “proclamation verses demonstration” debate?
I’ll join in right after I’m done beating this dead horse!
Amen and Amen and Amen to the post.
Rick – it doesn’t say anythign about ‘in Jesus name’ in those scriptures though. I think it is assumed that it is the followers of Jesus who we are all talking about.
Phil – I do not consider this a dead horse. What do humanitarian deeds by a muslim communicate to people? The love of Allah? Unless the deeds are accompanied by Jesus’ name they are unattached deeds of compassion that can be spiritually interpreted, or not, at the descretion of the receiver as well as the onlookers.
America feeds the poor in an attempt to solict national favor, the moonies, the mormons, the black panthers, and a legion of other groups use hunaitarian deeds to solit or curry favor for their group. So now Christians are suggesting we do humanitarian deeds without mentioning His name? I cannot fathom why unless we are lazy, ashamed, or do not consider it important that our motivation comes from Christ.
I would never feed the poor if it were not for Christ in my life and I want people to realize that as well as I want Him to be praised for anything I do.
Rick,
Chris L provided scripture and you’re acting like that’s not enough… because muslims can do this too? So can an atheist, etc. I’m really dumbfounded that you seem to be implying this scripture isn’t enough.. so I’ll just shut up now
that was me, not tim… but i’m logged in. weird.
The Scriptures Chris provided are not sufficient to prove God’s love. They are speaking to believers and also as a metophor for true faith. How is it that you are dumbfounded because someone quoted a Scripture and that should be “enough”. Isn’t that what you claim that is what “orthodox” brethren do, quote Scripture?
What did God do when he so loved the world? Did he feed it? Did He clothe it? Did he heal it? Or did He give His only begotten Son. That is the issue, not should we do those acts of compassion, but in what context and in whose name? You cannot act like you are the only ones who do acts of humantitarian acts, you are not. The issue is should we make an attempt to reveal the Risen Christ and His Father from whom all gifts flow or not?
I again cannot see the argument and its particulars, we should all be in agreement on this. I guess.
I’m glad we’re not living 2000 years ago. If we were after reading that last comment, I’d have to tear my clothes off, and cover myself in ash.
Again, Joe, you demean any respectful discourse with your sarcasm and fleshly wit. I guess my views and perpectives are worthy of the same dismantling humor and sarcasm as displayed by the Pyro posters, only the sword is in the other hand and thus approved.
I think the problem is that there has been a false dichotomy created here, and it has been done by the church over many years.
for example, rick asks, “Did he feed it? Did he clothe it? Did he heal it? or did he give HIs only begotton son?” — It’s not an either or question. He did all those things, so the answer is yes to all of them.
The problem is we have seperated acts of compassion from the gospel. We have made the gospel only the “proclamation” part, which honestly, isn’t the WHOLE gospel. Acts of compassion are part of the gospel, proclamation is part.
Why do we separate and compartmentalize everything?
Rick, we are justified before God apart from works. We are justified before men by our works (Romans vs James)
The only Christianity that the world sees is in what we do.
It is meaningless to “talk” about it. We need to “do” it.
Since we can not know the motive (in whose name am I doing this work) of a person I am not sure we we bother with such discussions. People do things for a lot of different reasons. God is glorified when good works are done. Even when they are done by the heathen or baptists
Bruce
Rick,
It’s just we have discussed this numerous times, and it doesn’t really go anywhere. My view is that all blessings are ultimately from God, and whatever channel they come through.
James 1:17 says:
So I guess I don’t think that we always have to bless people with strings attached. When we are led by the Holy Spirit we should speak, but otherwise we can let the Holy Spirit speak through our actions.
Rick,
Honestly after this statement:
You don’t have much room to complain about fleshly wit.
You basically built into your statement the assumption that everyone on this site isn’t orthodox and doesn’t quote scripture, while those we disagree with are and do. How is that helpful at all?
MJ,
I sense that the emergent church is just as guilty of compartmentalization. They emphasize works towards the least and the last and the lost over proclamation. I say it is two sides of the same coin.
In that, I agree with Rick. Anybody can do good works inside of a vacumn, and it will not accomplish the goal of Christian good works, which are done because one, we have been recreated in Christ Jesus to do good works, but also, to bring glory to God and not to ourselves.
That being said, reading the original post in my Christian worldview, I agree with these things and I must do them in the name of Jesus to bring God glory.
Just so everyone knows, Dr. Phil. Oprah, Bill Gates, etc. do these things also very effectively, but it is not for the glory of God, it is for self-justification. There is the difference, unless you are Rick Warren and you believe ‘I don’t care what you believe as long as you are doing good’
Yes, yes yes, and yes.
PB,
What if a genuinely poor person who was praying for a breakthrough happened to be one of the people who received something from Oprah? Just because Oprah’s motives are questionable, it doesn’t mean that God can’t use her resources. He works all things together for good.
When the Israelites left Egypt, the Egyptian gave them all their jewelry. This wasn’t done out of a pure motive, but yet it blessed the Israelites. God works in all situations in ways we may or may not see.
So Rick, you can have humor, but no one else can? Forgive me, I didn’t know.
Tim – Chris quoted two detached verses and somehow that is enough (proves the point)? And that is exactly what others are accused of doing (and sometimes do). That tone is much diferent than Joe’s comment which had nothing to do with the subject. My comment addressed yours (or whoever used your name), Joe just was grandstanding.
And of course your comment did not address Joe’s either, but at least you did address another comment which I addressed as well.
And by the way, Joe, the clothes you wear look like they’ve already been rent!
That, my friend, is humor.
pastorboy,
I somewhat agree with your statement — I said the church is guilty of compartmentalization — but didn’t make a distinction between emergent or otherwize — they are all the church. I think the ones labeled emergent have just swung the pendulum all the way to the other side to acts of kindness in reaction to it being the opposite for so long. In reality there needs to be balance, but it seems like history if full of reactions and big pendulum swings.
I wouldn’t quite agree that all of those people on your list do good things for self-justification though, and if that is a statement Rick Warren made, it would probably make more sense in the context it was said in.
I’m curious Mr. Freuh, is this the kind of meaningful dialogue you so desire? Taken from here
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Lets see, a muslim/atheist/whatever just responds to the law God has placed in them to help the poor, the Christians are busy arguing over it. Draw your own conclusions.
Now, Mr. Freuh, that was funny. I snorted my tea almost out of my nose.
Tim – you have found a way around my no comments policy. A breakthrough!
Sorry for my scriptural quotation w/o commentary – I had about 45 seconds to post before going off for awhile.
My point in posting them is that actions, even in the absence of words, are required, and are not more of, or less of, a blessing with a shared message.
It comes down to a level of trust in the Holy Spirit…
All the above…
Neil
Yes, Chris, all followers of Christ should do those things and more (mercy, grace, forgiveness, etc.) but in the context of being a follwer of Christ. These works do not have to precede an evangelistic tent meeting, but people should know we are followers of Christ when we minister to them.
There isn’t always a chance for dialogue or any doctrinal discertation, but His name should at least be mentioned or it should be understood that these come from Him.
A minister from The ministry of Word of Life told this story at a missions get together (he was a pilot). He said they flew into a South American jungle and desired to reach a certain tribe. They had one guide who spoke the language and one witnessing tape (audio). The tribe ran into the jungle upon hearing the first word of the tape. After some assurance they returned and went to listen in a large hut.
Somewhere as they were listening a lady began to cough profusely and the natives moved away from her. She was in the dying stages of terberculosis. This pilot went over and put his arm around her to comfort, he called the interpreter, and told her that the Creator wanted to have her go to his hut and she could only go with this Creator’s Son. He said His name is Jesus, and if you will believe and call upon His name He will take you to His hut in heaven.
Long story short she called upon this Jesus and died within the hour. I have a level of trust that the Holy Spirit can save someone with that basic a gospel in those circumstances. My point is, though, should he just have comforted her silently until she died? That is the essence of the Great Commission.
That’s worth repeating…
Neil
“Whosever believes”
So Neil, once must believe to eat and have clothes? Food is not redemption.
Issue settled…
Issue settled.
Then why are some so obtuse? It seems sometimes that some are content with humanitarian deeds and in them the Spirit can communicate the salvation message within the heart of the receivers even when they know nothing of the origin of this help. I mean that is how it comes across.
C’mon Rick. You’ve been around long enough to know that’s not the case.
What I’m saying is that maybe sometimes we are supposed be silent, and just trust the Holy Spirit. I don’t think we can boil it down to a formula. When we do that, we may actually be hindering what God wants to do.
So can we all agree that no one can be saved exclusively through acts of compassion?
Rick,
I’ve always repected your contributions to these conversations. But you lost me on this one.
Is your concern with Brant’s quote of pastor Ward’s words? Because they are some of the most powerful words I’ve heard in a while.
Or is your concern with some obscure vein of Christianity that says humanitary works save eternal souls? I’ve never heard anything remotely like that from the contributors to this site. And yet you seem to be addressing this site.
Sure. I’ve never really heard anyone actually say that they could, though.
It seems IF there is a Holy Spirit (I wonder sometimes) and IF we are indwelt by that same Spirit ( I wonder sometimes)
Then we move/work as guided by the Holy Spirit.
If the above is true…………..then we have no place to judge the “works” of others. Each gifted differently but all led by the same Spirit. Remember, One Lord, One Faith, One Baptism, 3000 denominations?
It seems that some people fear that some of us liberal/emerging/emergent/mclarenites are going to be too nice to people if we dare minister to their temporal needs. Better to keep those wicked sinners in their misery so they can better feel the pangs of Hell and be more responsive to our gospel preaching, yes?
I remember all the Mother Teresa hoopla. She is a good example of a person who, while Christians and theologians debate, actually went and did something about pain, suffering, and poverty. But, of course she is in hell, right?
Shane Clairborne lives out the gospel. His good works shine brightly. Yet, he is castigated and probably headed for Hell.
We live in a suffering world. Matt 25 makes it clear that we will be judged for the ACTUAL works we did/did not do in relation to the poor, sick, hungry and naked.
To paraphrase Rick, I simply don’t understand how professed followers of Jesus don’t get this. Read the gospels. Jesus didn’t HIDE this message from us, the CHURCH did.
Bruce
Is there ANYONE here that does not believe:
Jesus Saves?
Time to burn that straw man.
Bruce
Nate – I understood the words to elevate human works of compassion to a level inconsistent with Scripture. When I brought it up, no one corrected me by saying that wasn’t what the preacher meant.
If indeed he was just emphasizing our Christian works as important as conduits then I agree. But as you read the comment conversation it did not seem to be resolved early with an explanation. I was also surprised that our sharing the gospel was not included in plan A.
“I remember all the Mother Teresa hoopla. She is a good example of a person who, while Christians and theologians debate, actually went and did something about pain, suffering, and poverty. ”
So did Ghandi.
In all fairness, Rick, the excerpt is 6 sentences from a message. I’m an avid reader of Brant’s blog. And I’m sure if he sat under a preacher who said works and works alone were enough to redeem souls, Brant would not have quoted those 6 sentences.
God’s love is redemptive. It is found in the eternal not just the temporal. Jesus died as the Passover Lamb for the sins of the world, not the social and temporal ills of mankind. The angels rejoice over one repentant sinner, not one that is clothed. To suggest that Mother Theresa was doing God’s work when she did not share nor really knew the gospel outlines the difference in our understandings.
Jesus saves.
Sorry Rick, ya lost me…
Neil
Rick,
None of us can KNOW the spiritual reality of any one person. That is God’s Provence. You don’t know about Mother Teresa or Gandhi (you used the Ingrid spelling version of Gandhi BTW) any more than you know about me or anyone else.
Everyone of us have a full time job taking care of our own spiritual reality.
This is fundamentally platonic. God’s love is redemptive, but it is about His kingdom on earth as it is in heaven, and about looking forward to the physical resurrection of the body on the new earth. The ’sins of the world’ is better translated ‘the sins of the cosmos’ and is about more than personal sin. It is about social sins, structural sins, the selfish sins of societies that allow its own children to starve, suffer and be abused. And it is about the Church as the expression of God’s redemptive love changing all of that.
It is everything to do with the temporal and social ills of mankind.
“It is everything to do with the temporal and social ills of mankind. ”
Thank you, Ian, you are at least open and clear.
Bruce – About the Ghandi thing, Ingrid shares that with me over lunch every week. Humor again. I happen to be a man without a country – here on earth that is.
In the immediate wake of the 1990’s war in which “Christian” Serbs slaughtered “Muslim” Bosniaks, a truly Christian Croat led a ministry to the Bosniaks in Mostar that consisted of meeting immediate material and emotional needs. They had Bibles to hand out, but held them back so as not to have the appearance of exploiting the plight of the Muslims for evangelistic reasons. After a time, the Bosniak Muslims became curious why the Christian Croats helped them when the Serbian Christians slaughtered them… when the Muslim Mayor of Mostar was told they were doing it at the compelling of Christ, he invited them to hand out their Bibles along with food, clothing, counseling, etc… so they did.
Ian,
Just above the box in which you type your comments are two chevrons pointing right. Click on them and you’ll see a bunch of editing buttons. If you highlight the quote and click on “B-Quote” it will add the HTML markers so the quote is indented… that is, it becomes a block quote.
Neil
Tim,
“a muslim/atheist/whatever just responds to the law God has placed in them to help the poor, the Christians are busy arguing over it. Draw your own conclusions.”
I think that you just proved Rick’s point. An atheist can do good works, in fact an atheist friend of mine is a great guy. He’s kind, generous, and funny. A great guy to be around, always helping people. He’ll end up in hell if he doesn’t turn from his sin and cling to Christ. That’s the point.
I can do good works, this doesn’t mean that God is impressed. (filthy rags in fact)
I can do good works, this doesn’t give anyone motive to turn from their sin and place their faith in Christ.
My atheist friend can do good works, that doesn’t mean that God is impressed. (again, filthy rags)
In fact, my atheist friend doing good works makes me look bad. Especially when his good works equal mine. How can I say that he needs to become a Christian when I’m “no better than he is”
Thus people have the exact same motivation to believe as an atheist as they do a Christian if all I do is good works. What then is the advantage to being a Christian?
“There is NO NAME under heaven by which man can be saved”
The result of the “good work” game would be this.
I have to do more good works than my atheist friend if I want people to believe that it’s better to be a Christian. Thus it becomes a contest to see who can do more good works, who can look better, and kinder and most generous.
This is why we don’t try to win people by doing good works.
Inq,
You don’t do good works to get saved – you do good works because you ARE saved. That’s the difference between Christianity and all other religions.
We were saved for a purpose greater than simply a viral marketing of fire insurance.
No we don’t win people with good works but we sure don’t win them without them.
Read James. Read 1 John Read Matthew 5-7 Read Matthew 25
“No we don’t win people with good works but we sure don’t win them without them.”
Bruce – I agree fully with your sentiment, however, I was won to Christ by hearing Billy Graham on television and without one good work done to me by a born again Christian. So sometimes people can come to Christ strictly by the preaching of the Word, but as Chris pointed out works are inherant in a believer.
Yup.
I’ve also seen churches that say words that sound like the gospel, but they’re useless when it comes to anything other than echoing it back to themselves.
I would wager that it wasn’t just a Billy Graham crusade. Wasn’t there any Christians you encountered before that crusade who prayed for you, helped you out, or had a conversation with you? Or was it just the preaching of the word?
Ephesians 2:10
For we are God’s workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.
Matthew 5:16
In the same way, let your light shine before men, that they may see your good deeds and praise your Father in heaven.
I could probably come up with a hundred more but I think those two should work.
Chris – I had never met a born again Christian before I heard Billy Graham, not one. I never heard the phrase “saved” or “born again”. I had never been in an evangelical church so when I heard Graham is was all new to me. I was living with my atheist Aunt and Uncle and she treated me real well. I heard the gosepl, went out at night in March of 1975, climbed up the face of Garret mountain in the cold (right outside New York City), and that night I was saved.
I thought I was one of only a handful of real Christians in the world. I wondered aloud to God about the possibility of getting married since I didn’t know if there would be any girls my age who knew Jesus. So it was the Word alone that drew me to Christ.
Neither did the OP nor any of the comments say this.
First, why introduce hyperbole such as “always” and “never”? You know this is not true. Secondly, Jesus did command us to treat the symptoms as well as the disease.
Again, unnecessary hyperbole. No one is denying God’s saving power.
Chris P.,
Seriously man, we could have some good discussions if you’d just lay off the hostility and hyperbole. I understand you disagree with just about anything anyone here says, but why so hostile? – or maybe you just come off that way in type?
Neil
Chris,
“Wasn’t there any Christians you encountered before that crusade who prayed for you, helped you out, or had a conversation with you? Or was it just the preaching of the word?”
Don’t you know that good works are the power of salvation?
Oh wait, I got it mixed up again. It’s not good works, it’s the gospel that is the power of salvation.