I still think as I submitted before that Tim posted the post as a “comment” on cussing – not a comment about how he would rather be with sinners who know their need of grace than those satisfied with their own self-righteousness. I may be wrong, but that’s what I think. – Amy

One a person has said “Here is what I meant…” that’s about all they can say.

Neil

I am playing no game. All I did was express my hope that you would respond to the fact that you were apologized to and defended in like kind.

I’ll not expect nor hope for anything further.

Neil

My post #110 has an acceptance of Jerry’s apology, addressed to Jerry, along with other things, addressed to several other people. I could have posted the apology to Jerry separately. Would that have satisfied you?

It’s interesting that on this post I apologized, Jerry apologized, and John apologized . . . but unless I missed it Tim never has. Yet #99 remains the most vitriolic thing written here no matter what Tim wants to say he meant by posting it.

It’s also interesting that Tim’s supposed reason (what he says he meant by posting it) seemed to have nothing to do with the discussion at hand. The discussion was about cussing. I still think as I submitted before that Tim posted the post as a “comment” on cussing – not a comment about how he would rather be with sinners who know their need of grace than those satisfied with their own self-righteousness. I may be wrong, but that’s what I think.

Neil,
I can accept someone’s apology without pretending that that apology means the real issues have been addressed and taken care of. – Amy

Agreed. I was just hoping that since apologies were offered, and you were defended, that you would respond in kind.

I guess not…

Neil

Neil

Do you really believe that the posters on this site do not care or understand Scripture?

Neil

Then why don’t you shut down your sites and then there won’t be a reason for this one to exist.

Help us help you.

Dude, I so relate. That’s how I feel about this website. Amazing.

The poem condemns legalist to hell.

The legalist is already condemned to hell… as Jesus pointed out about them and their disciples.

Matthew 23:15. “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You travel over land and sea to win a single convert, and when he becomes one, you make him twice as much a son of hell as you are.

But then again here I am quoting scripture to people who seem to not care, see or understand it.

so tell me, how is any one that states a legalist is going to hell wrong? If Jesus stated this and other things about the legalist and their disciples, and you disagree, then it is you who may need to rethink your position.

iggy