Archive for the 'Christian Living' Category

Watchdawggie says 'Arrrrrr!'Avast ye landlubbers, lest we chum the waters with ye’r entrails!  Thus were the calls of the pirates of past centuries.  While the language has evolved quite a bit, the words of war and strife that long preceeded the Pirates of the Barbary Coast still pollute the world.  Sadly, as in the days of Pope Urban II and the later terrors of Torquemada, such words have become part of the language of the church, with frequent war-like language directed at brothers and sisters, though sometimes the casting of such words is almost Orwellian…

Love is Hate

While many Christian bloggers (sometimes ourselves included) may like to say they believe in the second greatest commandment, to ‘love their neighbor’, their writings and actions bear more resemblence to the Sadduccee interpretation of neighbor (”Other believers who look and believe exactly like me”), than to the all-encompassing view given by Christ (”everyone, especially those who you disagree with”).  In the conversations of today, this is no more apparent than in discussions around Seeker-Sensitive and Emergent/Emerging Christians.

ODM websites, in particular, spit out terms like “man-lovers”  or “man-pleasers” in response to kingdom calls for compassion or in response to Christians who believe that God created a world that sits somewhere between free will and predestination.  They instantly elevate any theological disagreement as if it were the preaching of another gospel rather than simply disagreeing with the systematic (man-made) theology of the ODM, and blast away accordingly, ignoring that Paul spells out the simplicity of the gospel message in I Cor 15:

For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, and that he appeared to Peter, and then to the Twelve.

Instead, “love” as it relates to those they disagree with has become a code word for “make sure they know they’re wrong”.  As I have noted before, many ODM’s have recast the two greatest commandments into something of hate, not love:

Love your God: Determine what it means for you to obey God, based heavily on tradition or your own social mores and – possibly – the Bible (insofar as the Ten Commandments are concerned), and then expect everyone else to “obey God” based on your definition.  If they don’t, they are somewhere between mistaken and apostate.  Additionally, to love God means to know exactly how He works and does not work and to know all the ‘Christianese’ terms which define these workings, along with all the right soteriology, and to then expect everyone else to understand God exactly the way you do.  If they don’t, they are somewhere between mistaken and apostate.

Love your Neighbor: Step 1: If your ‘neighbor’ is somewhere between mistaken and apostate (see “Love your God”), your first and foremost duty is to make them see the error of their ways, and if they do not, to warn everybody else that they are somewhere between mistaken and apostate, and by all means mock them and distort anything/everything that makes them mistaken or apostate in your eyes.  Step 2: If they are still around after Step 1, and if they are in need, it might be a nice thing to do to help them out. 

In contrast to this, in Galatians 6, Paul writes to us:

Brothers, if someone is caught in a sin, you who are spiritual should restore him gently. But watch yourself, or you also may be tempted. Carry each other’s burdens, and in this way you will fulfill the law of Christ. If anyone thinks he is something when he is nothing, he deceives himself. Each one should test his own actions. Then he can take pride in himself, without comparing himself to somebody else, for each one should carry his own load. 

Anyone who receives instruction in the word must share all good things with his instructor.

Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. The one who sows to please his sinful nature, from that nature will reap destruction; the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life. Let us not become weary in doing good, for at the proper time we will reap a harvest if we do not give up. Therefore, as we have opportunity, let us do good to all people, especially to those who belong to the family of believers.

I would also note the “IF” in v.1, as disagreeing with a tenent of a particular systematic theology does not automatically equate to sin or false teaching.  One of the takeaways from Paul’s observation is that we have a job to reap a harvest, and when a group of people is dedicated to shooting other harvesters in the back “in the name of love”, then there’s just something wrong with their definition of “love”…

Some folks have asked, though, “what about the legitimate threats/issues pointed out by these ODM’s?  Aren’t you throwing the baby out with the bathwater?”  I would reply with a question: If you were to visit a surgeon to work on your body, would you want one with a track record of, more often than not, amputating appendages which may not need to be removed?  There are better places to go for ‘discernment’, which seem to have a bit better track record than ODM blogs like C?N/SoL/AM.  Some of these include:

War is Peace

The Chrisian Pirate FlagOne of the more alarming aspects of the shift in dialog and, as described by Christianity Today, the ‘angry bloggers’ in this discussion is the rank demonization and militarization in the tactics of these organizations.  Whether it is the title of a sloppily-researched treatise, or an unwieldy attempt to militarize Jesus through verbal shell games, these groups ignore the myth of redemptive violence in spewing vitriol against those who dare to be different than the ODM’s far-narrower view of the narrow road identified by Jesus.

A microcosm example of this occurred on this site, when we adjusted our course to respond more so to ideas than individuals.  In response to this, a prominent ODM blogger replied in our comments section:

I’m not open to discussing this with you I’m not going to be commenting here after this. The lines have now been drawn… [emphasis mine]

Classically, these ODM’s have justified their violent rhetoric via self-visualization as modern descendents of John the Baptist and Elijah (though, obviously, sans the direct inspiration, which is the problem with this line of argument), or via Jesus’ purging of the money-changers in the Temple (which is a poor exegesis of the most likely motivation for this event).  Regardless, their methodology is aimed at other believers and has the timbre of a clanging cymbal.

Just as an example, one of these ODM’s has published an article headed with a Christian Pirate Flag (see above) headed:

You’re Not Fulfilling Your Biblical Duty!  Repent!

The purpose of this particular web page is to be forwarded to pastors who don’t give expository preaching in every worship service (or most worship services), to put them on notice (ominously “The Bible Warns Us About Preachers Like You.”) if they don’t change.  Steven Furtick describes the typical sentiment behind this type of ultimatum this way:

Don’t preach practical stuff to me. I would actually have to do something about it. Instead, tickle my brain with abstract philosophical rhetoric that I can say Amen about, nod my head in agreement with, and go home just as mean and carnal as I came in.

Preach about topics that make me feel smart and elite, rather than preaching the pure, simple, practical Gospel of Jesus in a way that a plumber and a doctor can both understand and relate to at the same time.

Go round and round about the minutia of the 2% of Christianity that churches disagree about rather than finding common purpose in the essentials of our faith and teaching us to make a difference in a lost and hurting world.

When you preach on marriage, for instance, don’t tell me practically how to treat my wife better. Spend 40 minutes talking about the mystical union of Christ and the church as it relates to the rapture and the design of the tabernacle in relation to Levitical dietary laws as understood by the Council of Trent.

That’ll bless me.

And I’ll go home, fat and happy because of the latest cognitive dump, and I’ll continue to treat my wife like crap and my kids like dogs.

And whatever you do…don’t preach messages telling lost people how to meet Jesus. I’ve already heard it, and I’ve already met Him. I want to go deeper.

Everybody else can go to hell. God will save ‘em if He wants to.

In a bit less hyperbolic manner, if you examine the three primary teaching methods of Jesus, you get a different, balanced perspective on teaching/preaching.  There are three methods used by Jesus and other contemporary rabbis (also called sages), which are: hagadah (”knowing the Word”), halakah (”doing the Word” or practical application), and parable to tie hagadah and halakah together.  Further, if we examine Jesus’ actual words, his teaching is divided almost equally between the three.

But I digress.

We are not at war within the church, and while there is a need for discernment, an amount of charity among brothers is required, without nasty attempts to first prove that the target of our criticism is not our brother, so that we can fire away without impacting our conscience.  Our enemy is not of flesh and blood, as Paul taught us, and when we pray for people in these ODM’s, we are not praying for our enemies (even though they may treat us as theirs), but for brothers who are harming the body via demonization and impeding the harvest we are called to bring in.

While it is difficult, and we are not perfect, it is important that we strive not to exact eye for an eye, but instead try to choose non-violent methods (some more creative than others) in counteracting the cannons precariously aimed within the walls of God’s Temple, and to remember that love is required.  As noted in one of the guiding principles of my non-denominational denomination:

In essentials, unity,
In non-essentials, charity,
In all things love…

Grace and Peace,

Chris

  • Share/Bookmark

Phoenix on the beachThis past weekend was one of lots and lots of emotion here in the Lyons family. We finished moving my oldest son, Phoenix, into his dorm up at Purdue (aka “the ONLY Indiana University” if you live in our house), and I’m not sure my wife has stopped crying yet (at least on the inside). It was also a weekend for amazement and an object lesson in what it means to “always be ready”.

“Be dressed ready for service and keep your lamps burning, like men waiting for their master to return from a wedding banquet, so that when he comes and knocks they can immediately open the door for him. It will be good for those servants whose master finds them watching when he comes. I tell you the truth, he will dress himself to serve, will have them recline at the table and will come and wait on them. It will be good for those servants whose master finds them ready, even if he comes in the second or third watch of the night. But understand this: If the owner of the house had known at what hour the thief was coming, he would not have let his house be broken into. You also must be ready, because the Son of Man will come at an hour when you do not expect him.” – Luke 12:35-40

As many of you know, Phoenix was accepted into the Purdue Varsity Glee Club this summer, an organization I have always been impressed with. This is its 114th year in existence – at a school without a music program! In fact, the lack of a music program is, I believe, part of the secret of its success. As a club that receives no university support, it is free of the pitfalls of church/state arguments, which means that it is able to unapologetically expect high moral fibre in its members and sing sacred music without fear of legal busybodies. Each year for the past 74 years, the PMO has hosted a Christmas Show (not a “Holiday Extravaganza” or “Winter Concert” – a “Christmas Show”) that is nothing short of spectacular. Typically, the first part of the show is traditional and modern, primarily secular, Christmas music with large dance/interpretive routines and lots of instrumentation. The second part of the show is then a Christmas Cantata that rivals anything I’ve ever heard (and I’ve heard a LOT of college/professional choirs). But I digress…

Back to this past weekend.

[more] 

  • Share/Bookmark
It doesn’t come to you on a silver platter, you have got to want it above everything else. That means you have got to pursue it above everything else while you are doing everything else. The first step to desiring it supremely is recognizing you don’t. Everything else will fight you with every distraction, attraction, endurance, conflict, time, and with all that is in the world.
You can memorize the entire Bible and not reach it.
You can know all the Greek and Hebrew and not have it.
You can write your own exhaustive systematic theology and be far from it.
You can preach on every verse in the Bible and not arrive at it.
You can witness and not progress toward it.
You can be doctrinally pure and be far from it.
You can teach a Sunday School class and not have it.
You can post blogs and not arrive at it.
Nothing is born of God without travail, and this will take a lifetime. It will cost you inordinate amounts of time. It will require deep focus. It will require some early mornings and some late nights. It will require limiting some social interaction and discipline of the tongue. Total forgiveness is a huge prerequisite and the foundation must be built with humility. You will suffer misunderstanding and you will sometimes be considered aloof. It necessitates pursuit when you are Spiritually exhausted. It is tangible and yet ethereal. It will satisfy and yet produce desire for more. There will be times you will not be able or capable to effectively communicate your experiences with anyone. Some experiences won’t translate into words. Sometimes God won’t let you share it. A personal desire for holiness will be part of the process. The search for truth is a door. Inconvenience must be accepted and flexibility practiced. You must surrender any comparison to anyone else and you must reject legalism and performance. You will be required to capture and direct your mind through conscious and sometimes frustrating discipline.

…to behold the beauty of the Lord, and to enquire in His temple…He that dwelleth in the secret place of the Most High…Seek the Lord…they that wait upon the Lord…that diligently seek Him…Looking unto Jesus…

THAT I MAY KNOW HIM

To know Jesus, that is the disciple’s journey. Not just know about Him but with an insatiable thirst pursue Him as if you will die if you don’t go deeper and deeper in intimate fellowship with Him. As Lord and as Friend. As Master and as Helper. As fearful and as comforting. We will have to take quantum leaps in quantity and quality in our prayer lives. We will have to both devour the Word and chew it over and over, and we will have to be able to during those times not read it looking for truths to buttress any doctrinal argument but as our living Spiritual food. Oh it will take more than the pro-life position. Much more than a ban on same sex marriage. Light years more than electing conservative politicians. It will take a slow and self-crucifying journey that will be accompanied by hills and valleys, victories and setbacks, and a frequent desire to feel content with where you are and stop pressing toward Him. Don’t look for a group to go through it with you, real pursuers are rare, and comfortable nay sayers are legion. The devil will remind you that you will see Jesus when you get to heaven so why go through all this trouble now. Discouragement will sit on one shoulder and self righteousness on the other.

So, as someone once said, count the cost. But if you agree to start a painful but unspeakably rewarding journey that seeks the heart and face of the Lord Jesus Himself, you will find Him. Not fully, for He is infinite, and not just as an efficacious object for salvation, no, you will find life. The abundant life cannot be found on this earth, it is only found in Him, and the deeper you go the more abundant the life. You want contentment and peace? You want joy and satisfaction? You want patience and hope? You want faith and love? You want an array of Spiritual emotions that transcend earthly definition and bring your inner man into a depth in Him that cannot be plumbed? Seek Him with all your heart, mind, and soul.

But if you want material, fame, corporate advancement, treasures, and worldly position…you’ll have to look elsewhere. But be encouraged, that road is glamorous and wide, and it is easily and well traveled even within the church.

But if you still desire Him…you’re going to need a cross.

  • Share/Bookmark

This is coming from someone who really can’t dance. My parents also didn’t let me listen to secular music growing up either.

So I led a Boston Harbor cruise event for my young adult ministry (mostly single adults). Here’s the thing that will annoy some of the more conservative posters here. We had dancing on the boat. And we danced to secular music.

Some of you will think I’m flaunting my “Christian freedom”. I’m not. Here’s the point of the story.

We were walking back to our cars later that night and we accidently ran into a friend in a life threatening situation. I won’t go into details, but this friend had not been on the cruise and we hadn’t seen her in a long time. She had sort of fallen off the deep end. God literally opened up a door for us to help her out and minister to her.

It raised questions in my mind. What if we hadn’t gone to the boat cruise, who would have helped her? What would have happened to our friend? Why hadn’t the friends she had come with helped her?

Our first thought was how much this was God’s timing. Boston has a population of 600,000, what were the chances of us meeting our friend? He put the right people there too, because we were able to address the situation in an appropriate and God pleasing manner.

I don’t think God wants us counting all the rules we keep. We can get like the rich young ruler, telling Jesus “all these I have kept.” (Matthew 20:18-21). However, like Hosea 6:6 says, “For I desire mercy, not sacrifice, and acknowledgment of God rather than burnt offerings.”

  • Share/Bookmark

Is the United States a Christian Nation? Are we the new Israel? If one looks at Crosstalk.com, this would be one conclusion you might come to. The entire look and feel is about the American flag and the red, white, and blue. In addition, some of the comments about the Hamtramck, Michigan news story also suggested an paranoid patriotism. The critics think they are not only protecting the Church in America, they are protecting the “manifest destiny” of this country.

It seems that our country actually has some very syncretistic roots. It was a mix of humanism, deism, and Christianity. For example, Thomas Jefferson not only owned slaves, he was also a devout deist. One of his most infamous works was the Jefferson Bible, his version in which he removed the miracles and resurrection because he didn’t believe Jesus was God. Some Unitarian/Universalist churches even use the Jefferson Bible as their pew bible.

Yes, there were Christians who helped found our country. But to claim that we are a special country that God loves more than others is really reaching. And to devout energy to keeping the infidels out seems like a waste of time and unscriptural. God is bringing the harvest to us. Shouldn’t we pray that we are prepared to share His Truth with whomever our new neighbors are?

  • Share/Bookmark

We’ve pointed out in the past that it seems like the watch doggies out there try to be holier than God, now it looks like they’re more Puritan than the Puritans were.

Our beloved Puritan ancestors may have been merrier than we might suspect. In 1620, the Mayflower had intended to land in Virginia or New York. But after two months at sea, the provisions were running out. Plymouth was a second, but necessary choice. As William Bradford wrote in his “History of Plimouth Plantation”: “We could not take much time for further search, our victuals being much spent, especially beere.” Once they landed, building a brewery became a top priority. The Pilgrims had a miserable few months with no beer. Soon enough they were making beer from barley, hops, birch bark, spruce and corn (the latter a contribution from the Natives). Hard liquor of all kinds was consumed by the men. Women and children drank hard cider and “small beer”. Drinking to drunkeness was discouraged. But they thought it superior than drinking the risky water from wells and streams. The Puritans used the Geneva Bible which had fallen out of favor with the royalty because of its anti-aristocratic marginalia. The King James version corrected the errors, but the Puritans refused to use it. The Pilgrims have a reputation for being miserly. In fact, their insistence that everyone work and no one should live off the labor of another had brought disfavor in England. Their economic views were “too Catholick” for English of the day. The Pilgrims had adopted the medieval Catholic principles of “fair price” and “just wages”. New ministers were saluted with “ordination beer” to celebrate the event.

When John Harvard established his College in 1636, he insisted that an adequate brewhouse be built: one that could satisfy the needs of both the students and the faculty. In the 1700s, the courthouse of choice was the local tavern. Judge, jury, lawyers and accused would all partake liberally. (There is a rumor that US Courthouses close down business at 4:30 PM because the taverns open at 5 PM. I can’t confirm that this is true, though.) So, Sir Peter, enjoy our Puritan customs: go out on the beach and have a beer or two. (Just don’t drink so much you can’t find your way home.)

Oh my! Beer, hard liquor, Catholicism and capitalism. If the Puritans were around to speak for themselves today, do you think they’d make the watch doggies’ blogroll? I suspect not. In fact I think after reading all that the watch doggies would put together some sort of post about the Emergent, Neo-Liberal, Pelagian, Roman Anti-Christ, Cult of the Puritans. But since they can re-invent the past in their own image they quote our lovely, beer imbibing, fun loving Puritan brothers:

“Whatever religion or doctrine condones or makes allowances for sin is not of Christ. The Doctrine of Christ everywhere teaches self-denial and mortification of worldliness and sin. The whole stream of the gospel runs against those things. Scripture emphasizes the ‘holy’ and the ‘heavenly’ (not the sinful and the worldly). The true gospel has not even the slightest tendency to extol corrupt nature, or feed it’s pride by magnifying it’s freedom and power. And it rejects everything that undermines or obscures the merit of Christ, or tries to give any credit to man, in any way. And it certainly never makes the death of Christ a cloak to cover sin, but rather it always speaks of it as an instrument that destroys it!”

Here, we see, yet again an example of the complete and total inability of the watch doggies to understand anything outside of their own context. They see a quote from a Puritan like the one above and assume that he would be on board with the watch doggies peculiar brand of “holiness”. There is absolutely no awareness that its possible to agree with the above quote and to disagree with the watch doggies, either in doctrine, the way that doctrine is expressed, or in lifestyle.

Whatever it is that compels the watch doggies to lash out at everyone who is not exactly like them also compels them to re-define their heroes of the past.

  • Share/Bookmark

ElephantLong ago in Sophomore English class, I often wondered if I would ever use some of the bizarre poetry and literature we poor young minds were forced to slog through. Well, younger self (if you’re reading this through some sort of time warp), today is one of those days.

John Godfrey Saxe’s poem, “The Blind Men and the Elephant“, which is based on an older Indian legend, tells a story of six blind men who encounter an elephant. The first one feels the side of the elephant and claims that the elephant is like a big wall. The second one feels its tusk and says, no, it is like a spear. The third one feels its tail and says that an elephant is like a snake. And so on… The jist of the story (I really was listening, Mrs. B!) was that the elephant was too big for any one man to comprehend, and that the collective view of the elephant was much closer to right than the individual viewpoints of the elephant.

Having read recent discussions over on the group blog I manage dealing with Pelagius, semipelagianism, monergism, synergism, open theism, and mixtures of -isms from the practical folk who don’t talk in -isms, I am drawn back to this analogy for a number of reasons, but primarily to to the nature of God and Time.

The Characters in the Story

Most churches in modern Christianity would agree that God is the Creator of time and space, and that He is not bound by them. This is summed up in His name. I AM. So, in my use of this story, God and his relationship with time comprise the ‘elephant’.

We humans, God’s created beings, are bound three dimensions of space and a half of one dimension of time (we experience it in one direction). Therefore, it is literally impossible for us to create a frame of reference in which we can completely understand time. (If you do not believe this, imagine that you lived in a two-dimensional world and you had to explain thickness.) In this story, we are the blind men.

[Continue]

  • Share/Bookmark

What’s up with pews? Does it matter what we sit in on a Sunday morning? Can I be at church and sit in a bar stool, movie theatre seat, cushy chair, sofa, etc? Does it matter what the material is, whether it’s wood, cloth, or plastic?

According to Wikipedia, the pew wasn’t even invented until the Protestant Reformation and the rise of the sermon.

Jesus and his disciples never sat in pews. However, since some think that uncomfortableness equals godliness and the human body is a bad thing, it seems that this becomes a way of self punishment. Do critics actually think they are more holy because they have sore backs and sore bums? Are they less holy if they have padded pews? And where is this in scripture, that sitting on hard wooden benches is a requirement in being a member of God’s army? Is it ok to sit on the ground?

Too many questions and so little answers.

  • Share/Bookmark

Does something become inherently sinful because of it’s roots or heritage? A while back we had a huge discussion on Christianity and yoga. Some suggested that yoga is bad because of it’s Hindu roots. The same arguments have been used for rock and rap music, Christmas, Halloween, marathons, etc. Can something’s roots poison it beyond Christian use and enjoyment?

At what point do we cross the line of syncretism, where we are blending our historical Christian faith and other cultures or religions? And can we appreciate work done by nonChristians (like a Van Gogh painting) without endorsing Van Gogh’s lifestyle?

On a side note, I have a good Christian friend who goes to yoga at her gym once a week. She hasn’t been asked to do anything outside of her faith and she has a vibrant walk with Christ. If there were things that her instructor asked her to do that weirded her out, like transcendental mediation, then she’d just not participate in that exercise.

  • Share/Bookmark